For centuries, humankind have faced a number of inventions like computer, airplane, television so forth. However, car must be the most essential invention that people have been using. Car makes long distances bearable, comfortable and gives us amazing opportunities thanks to its speed. But there is no shortage of debate about whether there will be fewer car in use than there are today. In my opinion, their popular usage will gradually decrease. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, like all other inventions, cars also have several disadvantages. Thanks to developing technologhy and specialization about its measure, we can observe their harmful affect. For example, last week I read an article about car and air pollution at bbc and cnn website. According to Bogdan Bogdanovic who is the author of passage air pollution have been increasing severely. Ten years ago percentage of air pollution that ocured because of cars was sixty, but today this amount have increased sixty-five. Its great increment may will cause irresistable consequences. My own experience is a compelling exaple of this. When I was in highscholl I was living Aydin where located to west of Turkey and very green area. Its population was too low therefore air pollution could not be realized. Then I won Hacettepe University which was located in Ankara where has very dense population and number of cars was very high. I did not almost breath first days because whenever I breath I feel smoke smell in my lungs. To sum up, with enhancement of education people realize affects of car to enviroment and they take crucial precaution about that.
Second, owing to developing technology, some new kind of devices that cary a number of people can be produced like subway, public bus, train etc. Furthermore goverments are aware of importance of public transportation therefore they invest amount of money to this field. For example, When I was university at enviroment class my professor gave us some data about goverment investment. We figured out that rate of transportation investment narly as same as education especially in Istanbul. Because both individuals and administrators can predict importance o future of transportations and things that it enables us to reach somewhere very easliy and environmentally friendly. For example, when I was in university first year I used to use my private car to reach campus. Itwas very costly and unbearable because of trafic and smoke. Then goverment build subway network between my campus and downtown, hence, I saved amount of time, money and I felt much more better.
In conclusion, I strongly belive that sooner or later people will be educated about car pollution and stop or decrease using of them. Moreover, within ten years scientists will produce kind of devices that cary all members of city with low cost, better conditions and environmentally friendly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percentage of air pollution that ocured because of cars was sixty, but today thi...
^^
Line 3, column 886, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t build subway network between my campus and downtown, hence, I saved amount of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2467.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1288981289 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92310945351 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573804573805 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 793.8 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1963008011 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1071428571 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1785714286 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46428571429 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195473583177 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524036563261 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846064405424 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139932945265 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688940853326 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.