Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your own experience.
These days, there is an ongoing debate for people whether they intake medicines by recommendation on internet or they prescribe with doctor first. While people suffering with disease which can be cure just by taking a generic medicine by just recommendation on internet but it can be lethal if disease is not secluded. This essay discuss both the views by analyzing this argument and explore the logical conclusion.
To start with, some people contemplate internet as primary doctor which can prescribe some generic medicines. People believe if symptoms are matching with common diseases then medication on internet can be beneficial and cure the person without loosing the money to doctor. For example normal fever, paracetamol is advisable. By doing this, firstly they get save money just visiting the pharmacy. Secondly, they can save time and indulging time in adequate task. People believe that some diseases can be curable on home just surfing recommendation on internet.
On contrary, other people argue that taking medicine without prescription can cause fatal error and could be apocalyptic for individual. Such families can be ruined which lead to devastated situation. For example, symptoms can match with normal fever but it can lead to fatal diseases. Without analyzing the ailments, intake medicines could make worse circumstances. People also argue breaching prescription process leads dilemma situation where individual finds himself alone.
In recapitulate, as aforementioned this essay discuss both the views of this argument. In my personal opinion, people should visit doctor before any intake medicines than surfing on internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
These days, there is an ongoing debate f...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and explore the logical conclusion. To start with, some people contemplate i...
^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
... beneficial and cure the person without loosing the money to doctor. For example normal fev...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st surfing recommendation on internet. On contrary, other people argue that tak...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...where individual finds himself alone. In recapitulate, as aforementioned this ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... both the views of this argument. In my personal opinion, people should visit doctor before any ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 253.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53359683794 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80402399755 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569169960474 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7589354519 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108640187798 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420553110294 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396263929377 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727051890742 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304758578639 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6.0
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.