According to the above statement recent survey shows that homeowners are eagerly willing to conserve the energy as well as for this manufacturer are now supplying the home appliances that are twice as efficient in energy conservation as compared to those which were sold a decade ago. Here, in the above argument it is claim that energy demand will not increase but it will further decrease. To be valid the author must provide more evidence or answer to some of the following questions.
It, at first, cannot be claim that energy demand will decrease without postulating worthy supportive evidence. People of that area may have different economic condition: all people can't afford to buy those appliances which are more efficient also cannot afford to that new technologies which are readily available for home heating. Hence, if the overall economic statistics of the people had been made clear than it would support the stated statement but due to lack of these crucial facts it is undermined.
Furthermore, it was not mentioned that how many homeowners were eager to conserve the energy or aware about the conservation of energy. without knowing this, it cannot assume that energy demand will decrease because for this the data including the number of homeowners interested in energy saving and not interested in energy saving is required: if there are higher people who were not aware about the consequences of the excessive use of energy then as a result more energy will be wasted. Besides these all, if this assumption become true there will be also need for the construction of new generating plants.
Lastly, manufacturers are marketing the appliances which are almost twice (not actually twice) as energy efficient as those sold a decade ago. Since, it lacks the clarification because it fails to answer the question that the appliance which were used before were how much energy efficient. Therefore, it is not clear that whether the developed machines are actually able to conserve twice energy or not, so the statement become obscure.
In conclusion, since there has been a dearth of proper evidence supporting the above lines, the argument doesn't hold firm and is considered as vague and flawed.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...must provide more evidence or answer to some of the following questions. It, at first, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ifferent economic condition: all people cant afford to buy those appliances which ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...aware about the conservation of energy. without knowing this, it cannot assume that ene...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...upporting the above lines, the argument doesnt hold firm and is considered as vague an...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, may, so, then, therefore, well, as for, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 364.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65393573666 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.5910976334 57.8364921388 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 119.503703932 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.324526521 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 5.70786347227 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276417115423 0.218282227539 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979279583568 0.0743258471296 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970469807139 0.0701772020484 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143267183809 0.128457276422 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931270730983 0.0628817314937 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.3550499002 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...must provide more evidence or answer to some of the following questions. It, at first, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ifferent economic condition: all people cant afford to buy those appliances which ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...aware about the conservation of energy. without knowing this, it cannot assume that ene...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...upporting the above lines, the argument doesnt hold firm and is considered as vague an...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, may, so, then, therefore, well, as for, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 364.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65393573666 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.5910976334 57.8364921388 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 119.503703932 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.324526521 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 5.70786347227 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276417115423 0.218282227539 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979279583568 0.0743258471296 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970469807139 0.0701772020484 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143267183809 0.128457276422 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931270730983 0.0628817314937 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.3550499002 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.