According to a government report, last year the city of Dillton reduced its corporate tax rate by 15 percent; at the same time, it began offering relocation grants and favorable rates on city utilities to any company that would relocate to Dillton. Within 18 months, two manufacturing companies moved to Dillton, where they employ a total of 300 people. Therefore, the fastest way for Beauville to stimulate economic development and hence reduce unemployment is to provide tax incentives and other financial inducements that encourage private companies to relocate here."
At first glance, the article seems reasonable that the new factories have more out-of -town workers than Dillton residents, so the unemployment rate of Dillton hasn’t changed. Even though Dillton’s city council has reduced the city’s corporate tax by 15 percent, and the city has also started providing the relocation amount to companies wanting to move to Dillton. Therefore, the author argues that the Dillton’s employment rate hasn’t reduced even after employing more than 1000 people by two companies but there are several plausible alternative explanations to this argument.
One possible explanation concerns the Dillton residents. According to the article published in the Dillton news paper that Dillton city’s council wants to improve the city’s employement rate and economy. There are many possible explanations for this. For one, the Dillton residents might not be as competent as required by the new factories. They might not have the required skills. Another explanation could be Dillton city might be lacking in infrastructure due to which many Dillton residents who are well educated might not be staying in the city. It seems they have migrated to another advanced cities where they might be getting better opportunities along with better salary & benefit.
Another explanation involves the new factories. Even though Dillton City’s council has reduced the corporate tax rate by 15 percent and it has started providing relocation allowance to the new companies. There are several plausible explanations for this. First of all, there might be political clashes in the city due to which factories might not be interested in starting its new plant in Dillton. Factories might have to get several clearances from the government before set up. Another explanation is city might not be providing the land at subsidized rate. It seems residents don’t want to give up their land to government because they might be thinking new factories would cause air pollution, water pollution etc. which can affect their health. In regard to land, residents may not be ready to sell their land, for not getting the price of their land as per current market.
A final explanation is regarding the evidence. The lack of substantiated evidence . Dillton’s city council has reduced the corporate tax by 15 percent but they haven’t mentioned how much it was earlier, then only it can be judged that this reduction is helpful to the new factories. Regarding relocation allowance, no amount has been mentioned. We don’t know how much exactly this amount is. Further, which type of new factories have started in Dillton city. Whether these factories are alike or different. There are several flaws in the article. They haven’t mentioned about the education system in Dillton city whether their residents have latest skills like computer skill, research skill. There is no clear indication of number of residents who are unemployed. Hence, it seems before publishing the article in newspaper, they haven’t done their research properly about the unemployment which could lead to false information about the Dillton city.
In conclusion, there are several plausible and sound alternatives to the argument. The author has made flaws in the argument regarding Dillton residents and factories. It is possible and even probable that the new factories are not recruiting the Dillton residents at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
At first glance, the article seems reaso...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'company'.
Suggestion: company
...rted providing the relocation amount to companies wanting to move to Dillton. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnative explanations to this argument. One possible explanation concerns the Di...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: NEWS_PAPER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'newspaper'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: newspaper
...to the article published in the Dillton news paper that Dillton city's council wants ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... staying in the city. It seems they have migrated to another advanced cities wher...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es along with better salary & benefit. Another explanation involves the new fac...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of their land as per current market. A final explanation is regarding the evi...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ence. The lack of substantiated evidence . Dillton's city council has reduced...
^^
Line 4, column 663, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the latest'.
Suggestion: have the latest
...in Dillton city whether their residents have latest skills like computer skill, research sk...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se information about the Dillton city. In conclusion, there are several plausib...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, first of all, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 16.3942115768 165% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2938.0 2260.96107784 130% => OK
No of words: 537.0 441.139720559 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47113594041 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90314507285 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 204.123752495 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432029795158 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 894.6 705.55239521 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 19.7664670659 167% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.4020138778 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0303030303 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42424242424 5.70786347227 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.67664670659 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253511029644 0.218282227539 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672868579404 0.0743258471296 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888105980596 0.0701772020484 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163548473435 0.128457276422 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695022520282 0.0628817314937 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.3799401198 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 98.500998004 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.