Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Children are God gifted and everyone has talent. Some children have special talent at an early age which might be visible to everyone, while some children attain talent at an older age. According to the recommendation, society should nurture the children with special talent, while society shouldn’t entertain the children who don’t have talent for training. There are several reasons for the disagreement with this recommendation.
In 21st century, it is irrefutable to say that children are born talented. They are so smart, so bright and so creative. If Society recognizes their talent and give them proper training at an early age, they can achieve a great milestone because early age is the period where children can learn and grasp easily. Nobody is aware of the accomplishments of Williams sister. They started their tennis coaching at the age of four and they did home-school because they used to send most of their time at tennis court. Today, they have the 3rd maximum grand slams title in doubles with her sister also several titles in singles. They set a paradigm for women in the era of sports.
However, it is unfair to segregate the children based on their talents. Here question arise how society is judging the talent. Do they have talent meter to measure? Because of this segregation, there would be many children who would get demotivated. For example, Thomas Edison was dyslexic, which prohibited him to succeed in classroom. His teacher described him as “addled” and his father thought that he was stupid. Because of his innovative mind, which was not judged at the early age, he had to face all such incidences. Later, he became a well-known inventor for the invention of incandescent light bulb. Hence, it is very difficult to distinguish children based on talent because there are some hidden talents also which develop with age.
Additionally, these talent recognition & training put pressure on children and parents as well. They devote more time on training and skip school. After training also, if that child didn’t get the opportunity to succeed, they feel tensed and pressured to succeed. Their parents also get depressed and create an unpleasant environment in family. For instance, in elementary school, they select students for advanced program by taking their exam. Students who don’t get in the advanced program feel depressed because their friends got selected and he doesn’t. There is a website Testingmom.com where many parents share their stories that how much they and their child are demotivated by not getting selected in this program and how it has created an unpleasant environment in their family. Specially, these days there are so much competition among children that it is very hard for the families and children to face any adverse consequences.
Therefore, it is undeniable that everyone has talent. Society shouldn’t differentiate children based on their talent because it’s consequence may affect children. When there are already so much competition everywhere, children should not be pressurized for such training. Because future is not certain, children might lose interest after rigorous training. Children should enjoy their childhood and make it memorable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this talent' or 'these talents'?
Suggestion: this talent; these talents
...which develop with age. Additionally, these talent recognition & training put pressure on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2755.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32882011605 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87556735506 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491295938104 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 6.24550561798 288% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5936659328 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4848484848 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40659822828 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962764786197 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822786273281 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241925047132 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839292157235 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.