With the development of society, the education of students has aroused a wide discussion. Some voice that it is the best way for students to learn if schools start the day at a very early time in the morning. Nonetheless, if we take a deeper consideration, if may not be formidable to come to the judgment that the statement is improper to some degree. I am going to elaborate my points in the following paragraphs.
The principal factor is that starting the day late will leave enough time for students to have breakfast, from which students can benefit a lot. Nowadays, many students have no time for breakfast due to the early classes, which causes serious disease in their stomach. That is why a large number of students often have stomachache. Therefore, if more time is left in the morning, students will certainly have sufficient time to eat a healthy breakfast, which dose significant help to their health.
What is more, in my city, the traffic is dramatically heavy in the morning. If the first class begins early, students have to get up much earlier than the beginning time to wait for a bus which is not full. Besides, as a result of the traffic jam, students will squander massive time in waiting, instead of studying. Therefore, starting at late time is more time-saving.
Last but not least. I am not denying that morning is the most precious time of the day. However, students will surely feel extremely sleepy and less energetic when asked to get up earlier to attend school. In this point, they will have low efficiency in studying, causing low grades and reducing studying motivation.
To put it in a nutshell, starting the day at a late time does tremendous help in gaining high efficiency which comes from sufficient rest, healthy body due to everyday breakfast and more time for studying, instead of waiting in the traffic jam.
- Do you agree or disagree?Because modern life is very complex , it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- According to a new report from the federal government, overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year. Most notably, donations to international aid groupsincreased by 30 percent, followed by donations to environmental groups, which inc 16
- Do you agree or disagree？The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 70
- Do you agree or disagree? The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character. 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s disease in their stomach. That is why a large number of students often have stomachache. Theref...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... time-saving. Last but not least. I am not denying that morning is the most precious time ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 2260.96107784 68% => OK
No of words: 321.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80373831776 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70545637221 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.5661374445 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7058823529 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.035492971682 0.218282227539 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0159152221242 0.0743258471296 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200824051057 0.0701772020484 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0227982665397 0.128457276422 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00919434365551 0.0628817314937 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 98.500998004 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.