According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en

This argument is well presented yet far-fetch. It lays a claim the Honor code help in to decrease number of cases Goventon's.So, all colleges and university should adopt the honor code.Nevertheless, the argument is in effect definitely unreasonable due to several flaws after a closer scrutiny, though it may appear plausible at the first glance.

To begin with, the author states that, After Groventon's honor code replaced by system at the primitive system place, average dropped down 21 to 14 in one to five years. The author associates the honor code with the drop in the average cases per year, however he fail to provide context and reasons why. The average number of cheating drop might be other numerous reasons.It might be possible that the student cheated and facility member could not success to find and report, hence bring down the number of cheating cases.Therefore we cannot assert that given statistics are correct without strong reason. another possible flaw of the author claim is one to five year data. After five year whether be increase or decrease? we don't know. Hence it is prove that, it is dubious and flaw. For the strengthen this case we need strong evidence.

Secondly, the author also cites a survey of students, which states that the majority of students are less likely to cheated with the an honor code in place than without. This survey base and scope is invalid and unclear.The author claim might be bolster, if they maintained number of student, type of exam pattern. The author has to consider the possibility that students may lie in the survey to get rid of faculty supervision during their exams. Thus, the this survey unreliable and weak.

Finally, Author suggest that all the author should adopt the honor code to decrease cheating case as Gorverton's. All the reason and claim of author is dubious and flaw than other college should not consider this facility to the other school and universities.

In conclusion the recommendations made by the author is factless attempts with feasible method could be nothing but a foolish errand. Thus, only by grasping the point of this argument could the author draw a convincible conclusion.

Votes
Average: 5.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...n to decrease number of cases Goventons.So, all colleges and university should ado...
^^
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
... university should adopt the honor code.Nevertheless, the argument is in effect definitely u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...placed by system at the primitive system place, average dropped down 21 to 14 in ...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'fails'.
Suggestion: fails
... the average cases per year, however he fail to provide context and reasons why. The...
^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...why. The average number of cheating drop might be other numerous reasons.It might...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...g drop might be other numerous reasons.It might be possible that the student chea...
^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...bring down the number of cheating cases.Therefore we cannot assert that given statistics ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...bring down the number of cheating cases.Therefore we cannot assert that given statistics ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...tics are correct without strong reason. another possible flaw of the author claim is on...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 725, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...e year whether be increase or decrease? we dont know. Hence it is prove that, it i...
^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ear whether be increase or decrease? we dont know. Hence it is prove that, it is dub...
^^^^
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... be increase or decrease? we dont know. Hence it is prove that, it is dubious and fla...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 751, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'proved', 'proven'.
Suggestion: proved; proven
... or decrease? we dont know. Hence it is prove that, it is dubious and flaw. For the s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...prove that, it is dubious and flaw. For the strengthen this case we need strong evidence. S...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...tudents are less likely to cheated with the an honor code in place than without. This ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...y base and scope is invalid and unclear.The author claim might be bolster, if they ...
^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...y supervision during their exams. Thus, the this survey unreliable and weak. Finally,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e author draw a convincible conclusion.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 363.0 441.139720559 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02203856749 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64294023273 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520661157025 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.1273391595 57.8364921388 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.277777778 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.70786347227 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 5.25449101796 343% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19801163045 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521633562193 0.0743258471296 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670543118202 0.0701772020484 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102441271216 0.128457276422 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573590653522 0.0628817314937 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

argument 1 -- OK

argument 2 -- not OK

argument 3 -- OK
----------------

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 369 350
No. of Characters: 1767 1500
No. of Different Words: 189 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.383 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.789 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.43 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.844 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.867 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.326 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.577 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5