According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.
This argument argues about the decreased amount of people in movie watching that produced by Super Screen Movie Production Company. This argument have two serious flaws.
First, according to report, percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers is increased during past year. Though, the report says that positive review was increased in specific movie only. So Super Screen Company should focus on another movies that have negative reviews and company should analysis and improve movie production.
Second, report says that the problem is not with quality of movies but beacuse of lack of awareness that movies of good quality are also available. Advertising and marketing are two factor that are important in all companies that have more number of people associated with them. Super Screen Movie Production Company can improve their movie review system by associating with well known websites available on internet that are only for reviews.
Although, before releasesing the movie company should do promotion in television shows that are famous and have great Televison Rating. In that way, people can know that company is going to release this type of movie.
In conclusion, Super Screen Movie Production Company should mainly focuse on review system and advertising to get more people.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eviewers is increased during past year. Though, the report says that positive review w...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... says that positive review was increased in specific movie only. So Super Screen ...
^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'factor' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'factors'.
Suggestion: factors
...able. Advertising and marketing are two factor that are important in all companies tha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 2260.96107784 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 203.0 441.139720559 46% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43842364532 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.56307096286 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42396569631 2.78398813304 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 204.123752495 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 705.55239521 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7624762073 57.8364921388 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.363636364 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.70786347227 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425000025493 0.218282227539 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176188122107 0.0743258471296 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132357969833 0.0701772020484 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238431436879 0.128457276422 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12709018838 0.0628817314937 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.3799401198 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eviewers is increased during past year. Though, the report says that positive review w...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... says that positive review was increased in specific movie only. So Super Screen ...
^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'factor' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'factors'.
Suggestion: factors
...able. Advertising and marketing are two factor that are important in all companies tha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 2260.96107784 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 203.0 441.139720559 46% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43842364532 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.56307096286 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42396569631 2.78398813304 87% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 204.123752495 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 705.55239521 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7624762073 57.8364921388 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.363636364 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.70786347227 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425000025493 0.218282227539 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176188122107 0.0743258471296 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132357969833 0.0701772020484 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238431436879 0.128457276422 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12709018838 0.0628817314937 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.3799401198 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.