"According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies ac

The advertising director claims that, despite of having good quality in the movies their are fewer people attending the Super Screen-produced movies .He basis his reasoning on the ground that, the percentage of the positive reviews has increased from the past year.To resolve this issue he suggest to allocate a greater share of the budget next year to advertising. This remedy is unlikely to be successful due to the flaws in the reasoning and the logic of the director.

First, the author readily assumes that fewer people has attended the Super Screen-produced movie inspite of the positive percentage of the movie reviewers being increased past year. The author fails to provide sufficient statistical data as he is only referring to the previous year data of the movies, he should have taken into account more duration of time.In addition to this, he thinks that their reviews are not reaching to the audience that hardly seems the case today as nowadays, people book the movie tickets based on the reviews that they receive fron the various sources like newspaper, mobile application, social networking sites etc. This indicates that he has been reasoning on the bases of incomplete facts and seems that their is no firm legs to his information.

Second, the author claims that the problem does not lie in the quality of the movie but the public's lack of awareness of the good quality movies available. This is again one of the weak argument and reason the author introduces, as he fails to define any correlation between the quality of their movies and the lack of public awareness for the movie. There might be the case that people does not find Super Screen- produced movie fascinating any furthur and are deviated towards other kind of the movies. Keeping this in mind, eventhough the director thinks of allocating the greater budget next year for the advertising won't be helping them due to the audience interest lost for Super Screen type of movies.

Though, there are several issues with the author reasoning, with proper research and clarification, it can get a solid base and hold in the argument. For example, by considering the more stastical data of the previous year's for the reviews he could have a better sense as to why their is deduction in the population of the viewers.

In sum,as we could see from the above mentioned reasoning and examples, we could find that the author's stance is acute to questioning and open for the debate

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...te of having good quality in the movies their are fewer people attending the Super Sc...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tending the Super Screen-produced movies .He basis his reasoning on the ground tha...
^^
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...nding the Super Screen-produced movies .He basis his reasoning on the ground that,...
^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...eviews has increased from the past year.To resolve this issue he suggest to alloca...
^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest allocating'.
Suggestion: suggest allocating
... the past year.To resolve this issue he suggest to allocate a greater share of the budget next year...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... the past year.To resolve this issue he suggest to allocate a greater share of the budg...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...aken into account more duration of time.In addition to this, he thinks that their ...
^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ases of incomplete facts and seems that their is no firm legs to his information. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... he could have a better sense as to why their is deduction in the population of the v...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...the population of the viewers. In sum,as we could see from the above mentioned r...
^^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ng and examples, we could find that the authors stance is acute to questioning and open...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, as to, for example, in addition, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 416.0 441.139720559 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92788461538 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58644462941 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495192307692 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 705.55239521 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.8473053892 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.015693213 57.8364921388 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.833333333 119.503703932 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 23.324526521 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.25449101796 209% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307919158148 0.218282227539 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125462937154 0.0743258471296 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147768612022 0.0701772020484 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161420245345 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114140556793 0.0628817314937 182% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.3799401198 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.3550499002 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.197005988 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 12.3882235529 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.1389221557 140% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.