An argument advised that university and college should adopt the Honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. It is based on the Grovton college claim claimed that cheating has been successfully reduced by adopting an honor code. However, Recent report stated that cheating among college and university is on the rise. Following questions need to be answered in order to evaluate whether recommendation will have desired result or not.
Firstly, how many students likely to notify faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated? It might be possible that students do not disclose other students who are engaged in cheating. In that case, the number of noted complaint will be less than the number of actual cheating incidence. Therefore, this question needs to be answered before evaluating the efficacy of the recommendation.
Secondly, how many college and university can effectively implement the honor codes? How many students were involved in the cheating exercise in the past? These questions need to be answered to evaluate the recommendation. There is a possibility that in other colleges and university student propensity to cheat is very minimal. In those college, there is no need to implement such law. Moreover, college and university capability to adopt the honor code should be considered to evaluate the usefulness of the system.
Thirdly, is student agree to such type of code? Is code is creating restive environment is the college or university? Is code questioning moral values of the students? If the honor code question the moral value of the students, then it can impact the students adversely. It might be possible that students are not agree to the code as some students can release their past grudge on other students, and that grudge can be caustic to individual career and personality,
In conclusions, above mentioned questions need to be answered properly to evaluate the recommendation since honor code can have negative consequences rather than positive impact if not implemented properly.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 341 350
No. of Characters: 1741 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.297 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.106 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.752 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.05 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.345 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.45 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.334 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.538 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun college seems to be countable; consider using: 'many colleges'.
Suggestion: many colleges
...y of the recommendation. Secondly, how many college and university can effectively implemen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this college' or 'those colleges'?
Suggestion: this college; those colleges
...propensity to cheat is very minimal. In those college, there is no need to implement such law...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...might be possible that students are not agree to the code as some students can releas...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as some students can release their past grudge on other students, and that grudg...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 2260.96107784 79% => OK
No of words: 344.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21220930233 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84761334651 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46511627907 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 76.610067831 57.8364921388 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3684210526 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1052631579 23.324526521 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459656839521 0.218282227539 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164951914897 0.0743258471296 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129370927942 0.0701772020484 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263816577887 0.128457276422 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171765916189 0.0628817314937 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.