In the letter from the owner of the Sunnyside tower apartment complex to its manager, The owner predicted that modifying showerheads to restrict water flow throughout all twelve buildings in the Sunnyside tower complex will increase profitability. The owner came to this conclusion based on the result of first three buildings of the apartment. However, In order to find out whether the prediction is reasonable or not, we must get answers of following questions.
Firstly, What will be the impact on the Showerheads and on its Components such as Pipes , regulators, valves and etc in long period of time?. Perhaps It might be possible that modifications in the maximum water flow will have severe consequences on the components. Not much information is available since the adjustment. All these questions need to be answered before evaluating the prediction. If the sost associated to the components is high, then it will have negative impact on the prediction.
Secondly, what are the modifications required in showerheads systems to reduce the maximum water flow? What is the water flow requirement of the individual person? How much changes occurred in reading after the adjustment? All these questions need to be answered to examine the prediction. It might be possible that showerheads are not operating on maximum water flow, but persons are more bothered about water quantity. In that case, reduction in the maximum water flow will not be required. Moreover, it will increase cost due to installation of new component to reduce water flow.
Thirdly, How many Complaints are reported ? How many new complaints are reported in recent time? It might be possible that initially only few complaints were reported, but over course of time frequency of complaint increasing. If that is the case, then it will have serious impact on the goodwill of the apartment, and can result in decrease in the value of the apartment.
In conclusion, above question required to be answered to evaluate the reasonability of the decision. If the above mentioned questions are not answered consciously , then it will be difficult to predict.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 343 350
No. of Characters: 1737 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.304 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.064 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.87 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 121 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.22 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.304 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.107 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eads and on its Components such as Pipes , regulators, valves and etc in long peri...
^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...es , regulators, valves and etc in long period of time?. Perhaps It might be possible that mod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...quirement of the individual person? How much changes occurred in reading after the a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d questions are not answered consciously , then it will be difficult to predict. ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...then it will be difficult to predict.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 2260.96107784 79% => OK
No of words: 343.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21282798834 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98352140598 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481049562682 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5383475119 57.8364921388 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1428571429 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.70786347227 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256834567361 0.218282227539 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679218289804 0.0743258471296 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127376612727 0.0701772020484 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14186743852 0.128457276422 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180531343673 0.0628817314937 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 98.500998004 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.