ARGUMENT:A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majo

The author claims that new Captain Seafood restaurant becomes popular for their special seafood which is unique for this restaurant. Also bolster his conclusion author provides more information like Bay residents are more concern about their health and most of the family are two-income groups. At a first glance it seems plausible to believe author's side however careful scrutiny can reveal its logical flaws and ill-terminology.

First of all, recent sales study figure out that consumption of seafood dishes has higher rate than before. Around 30 percent increases are shown this report. This increasing rate is enough to prove that seafood is popular dishes now. Perhaps population growth rate is high in this area from other regions for more job opportunities as well more urban facilities. This 30 percent increases may be the result of increased population. So, it must be clear first.

Secondly, author mentions here that residents are more concern about their health as a result sea-food popularity is increased day by day. Only sea-food could keep a good health? Aren't there any other options to build-up body fitness? Food-cost is a reason which food is chosen by someone. Not only food health but also food-rate might concern all of the people. Perhaps sea-food is very costly and never possible to general people bear this cost in their every meal. They may choose this food occasionally on the other hand taken same food all the time might turn into monotonous for anyone. Everyone wants to change their taste. Thus, only depending on this factor terminate this synopsis seems vague.

Thirdly, author gives some strength about food cost by indicating two-income family position. No doubt, it is obviously indicating a wealthy family and huge possibility that job-holder cannot cook at their home. A nationwide study result also represents here that conclusion is over a decade ago they ate home-made food but now this habit obsolete Bay residents. Taken outside foods never indicate that they bias on sea-food. Perhaps, varieties foods are found outside. Moreover, There are ample restaurant in Bay City discern that people are used to going there regularly. Healthy-diet must be continued without sea-food all over the world. Hence, doubtful assumption arises in this point of view.

At the end, author must provide more information to bolster his opinion. Uniqueness on a special food must provide some special gather of customer to taste this food but not indicate huge popularity with profit. Aforementioned information must be analyzed to corroborate author point otherwise it seems vague and conclusion never be accepted through criticism.

Votes
Average: 5.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...od which is unique for this restaurant. Also bolster his conclusion author provides ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Aren't
...Only sea-food could keep a good health? Arent there any other options to build-up bod...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...health but also food-rate might concern all of the people. Perhaps sea-food is very costly...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 497, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'restaurants'?
Suggestion: restaurants
...ound outside. Moreover, There are ample restaurant in Bay City discern that people are use...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on never be accepted through criticism.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, no doubt, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 28.8173652695 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2249.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 425.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29176470588 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60115917732 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 204.123752495 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.059209909 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5517241379 119.503703932 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6551724138 23.324526521 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27586206897 5.70786347227 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121237974361 0.218282227539 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370356170332 0.0743258471296 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594512392434 0.0701772020484 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074623698875 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639378404935 0.0628817314937 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.3550499002 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.197005988 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 98.500998004 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 29 15
No. of Words: 426 350
No. of Characters: 2193 1500
No. of Different Words: 237 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.543 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.148 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.55 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 162 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.69 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.058 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.552 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.256 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.45 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.051 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5