This line graphs show that how much wastes are generated from the three different company named A, B and C and make a comparison over 15 years. The wsate measurement is conducted in ton Unit.
Overall process of waste generations for three companies are varied from each other within this time period. Some are increased and some are decreased. This will describe in below.
First of all, company A produced 12 tonnes waste in 2000 but gradually it decreased and in 2015, this figure turns into just below the 9 tonnes. The difference is above 3 tonnes as whole. On the Other hand, company C is just opposite from A because their wastages are increased day by day. In 2000, they made only just upper the 3 tonnes waste but now its above 9 tonnes. Almost 6 tonnes are increased in this time period and every five years it adds 2 tonnes overall.
Secondly, the scenario of company B is different. The reason behinds that the flactuation of waste generation that is never seen anywhre. Huge declination makes the figure at the end of 2015 is only 3 tonnes but at the beginning it was just less than 9 tonnes. In first 5 years, wastes were increased but after that time it declines dramatically.
In conclusion, waste generation is not same for all companies. Though company A and C produces same amount of waste in 2015, company B declines it a lot.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
This line graphs show that how much wastes are generated from the three dif...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61570247934 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54537740036 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557851239669 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7427487938 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.8125 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.125 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225894354566 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06957216147 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765235370983 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138826236504 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638558357103 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.92 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.