While anyone want to contribute to something, that does not mean that he/she must have previous achievement in this fields. Though previous knowledge obviously are helpful to someone, it is not easy to ensure for every work running this way. So, it is too far to say that only previous achievement brings someone success in that field.
First of all who are freshers in that field, what are approaches taken for them? If our mind set-up in this way that we never allow fresher any job beacuse of that beliefs, freshers might fall into depression for this deprivation. As there is a huge chance, they never involve any jobs anywhere. Then how come the expert in that fields infuture if anyone do not get chance? Every scolars in different fields never sustain for whole life. It is natural process that older might create place for newer one. For example, a fresh graduate who never get a chance to show his adroit then how it is possible to judge his skill only showing his previous caliber. Is it possible for him to show this knid of achievement in starting point? It is totally vague idea to think that way.
On the other hand, if someone wants to recruit a professional person for a specific works which is too much sensitive in that case every one search for a person who have already such kind of achievement. This reputation must be ensured to rely on this person undoubtedly. Pervious knowledge obviously helps him to get success for newer one. But it should not be biased for experts to generate future experts. Always welcome fresher for their new ability, new innovations.
Moreover, not only past achievements but also many other factors are related to make a sucessful outcome. For instance, goverment wants to construct a bridge on a river that's why recruits an expert civil engineer for this work. But there is shortage of fund, time limit and workers. Thus it is impossible to make a strengful bridge with such kinds of barriers. Only his previous knowledge never helpful for a significance contribution in this circumstance. Government must ensure to provide all kinds of related needs to build a bridge which is long lastings and public can get benefits from this conructions. If by using cheap instruments, bridge might be watchable but never affordable to bear huge load. As a resut an accident might occurs which not only loss of all efforts while working but also loss of people which never expected.
Lastly, only previous achievements are not always determine someone skills. Perhaps a job candidate have good marks in his certificate and published many research on that subject in reputaed journal but no field experience then it is quite difficult to judge him. Real field works might have a discrepency wih its pare-based knowledge. For example one students know how to prepare a good questionnaire for road survey but he never do it in the fileds then it quite difficult for him to face such kind of interacting job. It may take time to familiar with this job and after some years he/she might be an expert in his duty.
In conclusion, it is clear that only previous knowledge never helps all issues. Some bindings might be overcome for contributiong any works. Every works are differnet from each others so it should be treate in his own way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
While anyone want to contribute to something, that does n...
^^^^
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e/she must have previous achievement in this fields. Though previous knowledge obvio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... success in that field. First of all who are freshers in that field, what are approa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...xpert in that fields infuture if anyone do not get chance? Every scolars in differ...
^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... wants to construct a bridge on a river thats why recruits an expert civil engineer f...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ortage of fund, time limit and workers. Thus it is impossible to make a strengful br...
^^^^
Line 9, column 150, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: much research; a good deal of research
... marks in his certificate and published many research on that subject in reputaed journal but...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one student', 'a student', or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: one student; a student; students
...h its pare-based knowledge. For example one students know how to prepare a good questionnair...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 432, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...stionnaire for road survey but he never do it in the fileds then it quite difficul...
^^
Line 11, column 142, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...e overcome for contributiong any works. Every works are differnet from each others so...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2721.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8074204947 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58686507545 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496466431095 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.720778703 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4545454545 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1515151515 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114850436489 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348387898423 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299548032742 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656147958751 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246039419466 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.