In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patrol, many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. Prunty County should instead undertake the same kind of road improvement project that Butler County completed five years ago: increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. Today, major Butler County roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet there were 25 percent fewer reported accidents in Butler County this past year than there were five years ago.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Highway safety in the Prunty County has been lowered because of the accidents which took place in the last few years. The Constitution has taken necessary steps by lowering the speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour in the city. Inspite of this action, the accidents didn't reduce and there is a new claim raised which states, in Butler County the project which improved the roads by improving the visibility at dangerous intersections, resurfacing rough highways and increased the width of the lanes. This seems to be a very good solution for Prunty County since the accidents are increasing every day they have to act immediately in order to prevent the accidents. While the claim states that Bulter County has improvised their lanes, but problem argument has didn't provide any problems on the lane in the Prunty county or any other reasons for the incidents.
Firstly, Prunty County has made some immediate measures in bringing down the speed limit of the vehicles by 10 miles per hour. But the personnels of the County should have analysed the issues before making such rules in the city. Since citizens who are not present in the city during the rule enactments might not know the rule and keep on driving in 55 miles per hour. And personnels should have looked for the problem in the city which causes these regular accidents and made a proper solution other than going for other neighbouring County's solution.
Secondly, Butler County lanes and other such measures might have worked out properly for them, may be their lanes supported such design immediately which could have lowered the accident issues. Even there is a possibility where Bulter County accident rates where even lower before the implementation of the system. On the other hand Prunty County region and location cannot be similarly coherent with Butler County, so incorporating their improvisation might not work well for the problematic roads in this County.
Thirdly, there are no evidence or any numbers provided for the accidents. Certain questions can be rised like the County's current population, the density of the traffic, is there any need for lanes or expansions required? all these questions come into picture and can be answered only when the authority of the County makes proper investigation in the city and provide the authenticated numbers to make appropriate actions.
Additionally, Butler County solution could have worked in a place where large roads are feasible, so in similar aspects if the Prunty County roads are viable to such solution the actions can be possible, iff the place is prone to accidents.
In Conclusion, the solution taken from the Butler County should be reconsidered before making any actions in the County. Since there is no clear evidence or investigations conducted for the events in Prunty, the constitution or the respective authority should immediately make necessary actions to find this out and fix the issue properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
.... Inspite of this action, the accidents didnt reduce and there is a new claim raised ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 764, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...d their lanes, but problem argument has didnt provide any problems on the lane in the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: All
... need for lanes or expansions required? all these questions come into picture and c...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.282692307692 0.25644967241 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.157692307692 0.15541462614 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0673076923077 0.0836205057962 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0423076923077 0.0520304965353 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00961538461538 0.0272364105082 35% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121153846154 0.125424944231 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0576923076923 0.0416121511921 139% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63892234613 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0153846153846 0.026700313972 58% => OK
Particles: 0.00384615384615 0.001811407834 212% => OK
Determiners: 0.138461538462 0.113004496875 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0269230769231 0.0255425247493 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0192307692308 0.0127820249294 150% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2952.0 2731.13054187 108% => OK
No of words: 485.0 446.07635468 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08659793814 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.57801047555 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364948453608 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.249484536082 0.287650121315 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175257731959 0.208842608468 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115463917526 0.135150697306 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63892234613 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 207.018472906 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468041237113 0.469332199767 100% => OK
Word variations: 53.4061677789 52.1807786196 102% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.039408867 90% => OK
Sentence length: 26.9444444444 23.2022227129 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6637095928 57.7814097925 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.0 141.986410481 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9444444444 23.2022227129 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.944444444444 0.724660767414 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 51.8928980527 51.9672348444 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.20183486239 1.8405768891 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419468954948 0.441005458295 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128667082315 0.135418324435 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0537909108541 0.0829849096947 65% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.67320363399 0.58762219726 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117790971609 0.147661913831 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197891568591 0.193483328276 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860834126975 0.0970749176394 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.396074128803 0.42659136922 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.124824223047 0.0774707102158 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263916496706 0.312017818177 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10033411125 0.0698173142475 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.33743842365 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 5.36822660099 112% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.