The author states that autonomy of any country is based on its border and to prevent economy and national identity, authors think to return the illegal immigrants back to their country origin. This offers can intresting argument, but it needs to be explained thoroughly as the assumptions made by the author is too strong and not supported by the points made in passage.
Firstly, author explains that autonomy of country depends on strength of border. So here this might be true but there is no evidence for dependence of autonomy on border only which needs to be explain properly in argument. Also there are many factors on which country's autonomy is dependent like military strength. so this needs to be properly justified.
Secondly, author states that the illegal immigrant are not checked which leads to endanger of economic and national identity. This may not be true. As if the country is underdeveloped then there may be chances that the immigrants are helping them in business or raising their business and providing jobs for the deveopment of country. author did not specified that all the illegal immogrants are bad or not. Considering all bad needs to properly justified as he has taken a strong judgement on risk of country's economy and national identity.
Also, these immigrants should return to native country as they are threats. This statment of author need to be explain properly as there is no evidencenof illegal immigrants posing threat to the country. Returining to their native place might be a wrong idea as they may be helpig the people living their for their welfare. So assuming that theybare threats cannot makes the argument strong.
So the argument is weak as the conclusion drawn are rife with assumptions and cannot be considered as fact until the stated assumptions are addressed properly.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 303 350
No. of Characters: 1498 1500
No. of Different Words: 142 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.172 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.944 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.604 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 120 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.643 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.78 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.786 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.355 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.611 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.104 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... only which needs to be explain properly in argument. Also there are many factors...
^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ds to be explain properly in argument. Also there are many factors on which country...
^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...my is dependent like military strength. so this needs to be properly justified. ...
^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Author
...ing jobs for the deveopment of country. author did not specified that all the illegal ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'specify'
Suggestion: specify
...e deveopment of country. author did not specified that all the illegal immogrants are bad...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 2260.96107784 68% => OK
No of words: 303.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05940594059 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65756706442 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498349834983 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0951828398 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8125 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.70786347227 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278063615164 0.218282227539 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979820607377 0.0743258471296 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772814009258 0.0701772020484 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154384302532 0.128457276422 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680714952473 0.0628817314937 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.