In the prompt, it states that Forsythe citizens adopted haelthful lifestyle. This conclusion is based on the survey on eating habits of the citizens and the increase trend for kiran and decrease trend for sulia. However, before evaluating this proposed argument following assumptions must be examined.
First of all, Author of the prompt assumes that people chose healthy lifestyles by considering only eating habits. Author is assuming that there are no other factors that contribute to their adoption of salubrious lifestyle. Perhaps, they might excercise daily and do yoga daily, this can also be a factor for their healthy lifestyle. Further, people of Forsythe might have adopted cycling which is good for health and also might decreases cholestral. Author blindly assumes only eating habits lead to helathy life.
If this scenario has merit then the original argument does not hold water.
Secondly, Author assumes that people of the Forsythe gave appropriate information in the survey. Perhaps, citizens might have given wrong information regarding their food habits though they follow the nutritional plans proposed by the government. Author also assumes that all citizens follow the diet plan recommended by the government. Perhaps, people chose different diet plan other than suggested by government. Perhaps, only few people follow government nutrition plan. If this assumption is considered as true then it seriously weakens the argument.
Finally, while drawing the conclusion author assumed that increase in sales of kiran containing food products is a reason for people adopting healthy lifestyles. Author is assuming that there is no other cause that led to increase in sales of kiran food products. Perhaps, advertisements related to kiran food products have been increased recently and these adverstisements have attracted most people and this significantly might have led to increase in the sales of this product. If this scenario is true, then the argument can be undermined.
In conclusion, the argument , as it stands now, is fully flawed because of unwarranted assumptions mentioned above. To evaluate the argument proposed by the author, he has to provide more evidence, then it is possible to evaluate the argument that Forsythe people have adopted healthful lifestyles.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 354 350
No. of Characters: 1897 1500
No. of Different Words: 161 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.338 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.359 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.668 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 153 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 86 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.236 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.619 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.316 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.538 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nly eating habits lead to helathy life. If this scenario has merit then the origin...
^^^
Line 6, column 516, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as true 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...f this assumption is considered as true then it seriously weakens the argument. F...
^^^^
Line 10, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dermined. In conclusion, the argument , as it stands now, is fully flawed becau...
^^
Line 10, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople have adopted healthful lifestyles.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, while, as to, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 354.0 441.139720559 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5197740113 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76292511793 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 204.123752495 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483050847458 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2005742223 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0476190476 119.503703932 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.70786347227 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184125232621 0.218282227539 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566917473917 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497692604855 0.0701772020484 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887778163189 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537003390658 0.0628817314937 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.