In present day world beginners are making good contributions to the field they are in. The author mentions that the beginner makes important contributions in any field than the expert does. However, I mostly disagree with author for the two reasons, which i will elucidate below. I would concede that there are a few exceptional cases where beginners are more likely to make important contributions than the experts.
First of all, Not in every field of inquiry, beginners can make important contributions to the field than the expert would contribute. Because, most people agree that most fields require experts, who make contributions to the field, in such fields beginners cannot help the field. For instance, a company, which produces aeroplanes, requires experinced employees to design the aircraft and require experts to fabricate the material required for the aircraft. Beginners in such compony may not have much to contribute to the company where experts can most contribute. Moreover, in a firm where advanced research occurs in such firm beginners might not make important contributions where as experts are more likely help the firm in research. Beginners can make contributions but in some firms where experts are required beginners would not contribute much than experts do.
Secondly, the beginner is not more likely to make important contribution in every field of inquiry they work. Because, contributions made by beginner could not be that important to the contributions made by experts. For instance, the beginner in a company can contribute to a ongoing project but those contributions might not be that important. Furthermore, naive worker in a factory who does not know how factory works can learn the work and start contributiong to the factory but his contributions might be helpful but might be not that important when compared to the contributions made by the experts. These examples can be attributed to any field of inquiry.
Admitedly, In some fields beginners have wide scope to contribute more likely than the experts. For example, in some fields where the work is related to the recent trend the beginner would have aware of the recent problem and he would make contribution that might help company. In such fields experts might not help the field as they might not have new recently emerged problem. To conclude, For the two main reasons mentioned above i mostly disagree with the prompt that in almost every field beginners are more likely to make important contributions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... with author for the two reasons, which i will elucidate below. I would concede t...
^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... might not make important contributions where as experts are more likely help the firm i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on in every field of inquiry they work. Because, contributions made by beginner could n...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 275, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...beginner in a company can contribute to a ongoing project but those contributions...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20689655172 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85383280319 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.389162561576 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1798498953 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.263157895 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.551493473431 0.243740707755 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235457473525 0.0831039109588 283% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143903589836 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.408749797862 0.150359130593 272% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877438852623 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.