The author of this argument predicts that if the provision of new houses in the Maple County is restricted, it will cause a major increase in the prices of the houses. This proposal requires further information and analysis because existing assumptions and facts are not strong enough to lead this argument.
Firstly, a county’s development cannot define only from the infrastructural development like farmland. Therefore, is there any other reasons for preventing the farmland development? For an example, there is a strong public opinion against use of farmland for development or ongoing legal dispute over ownership of farmland with farmers, it would sound more sensible to propose a measure like above and evaluate further.
If the Maple County council is concerned about the country going overdeveloped, then another question that requires answers is what other development schemas are currently running in the Maple Country? If the County has proposals for a new mall complex, new baseball field, and new housing scheme in downtown, it will be necessary to assess the scope of development in infrastructure in each of them and then another analysis of how well similar projects had taken place other Countries.
In this argument, only the present status of two County’s have been considered. Therefore, next question would be, what are other Countries in the state that adopted a similar measure in the past 30 years? This will provide a bigger pool of data on Countries which move forwarded with preventing farmland development. Further, from the data collected, it need to raise questions like is there how many County has observed increase in housing price and how many are not? If 20 Countries were identified in the analysis, which had prevented farmland development within 30 years of time, and rise in housing prices was observed in 12 Countries out of them, it will still be too early to establish a prediction.
The next question that will require answer to make a solid prediction is, are there any overlapping situations in the Countries that showed same behavior over the years? What are the common factors that Maple County have with those Countries? If 7 Countries out of the 12 Countries either had newly discovered a valuable natural resource or famous tech giants had opened up their offices in those county, then such factors would have increased the popularity of the County and more and more people had started settling in County limits in seek of jobs. If in the Maple County also, a reputed university is going to establish a new school, then this will most likely to be a reason for increase in housing prices because many students will start to move in.
Therefore, it will be necessary to work on questions or surveys until a complete and solid analysis is formed on whether preventing farmland development will increase housing prices in the Maple County. This will provide a cogent insight on, whether the prediction made by the author will stand or not.
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 78
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 55
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 63
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station quot To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population gro 68
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall stu 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: MANY_NN
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun County seems to be countable; consider using: 'many counties'.
Suggestion: many counties
...ed to raise questions like is there how many County has observed increase in housing price ...
Line 11, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
.... This will provide a cogent insight on, whether the prediction made by the autho...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, still, then, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 55.5748502994 122% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2515.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 495.0 441.139720559 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08080808081 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72635674854 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 204.123752495 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476767676768 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 705.55239521 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2182315597 57.8364921388 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.722222222 119.503703932 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.324526521 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.70786347227 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262153535501 0.218282227539 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888735552988 0.0743258471296 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059716004185 0.0701772020484 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136473136947 0.128457276422 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538753063949 0.0628817314937 86% => OK
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.3799401198 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 495 350
No. of Characters: 2448 1500
No. of Different Words: 223 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.717 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.945 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.644 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 186 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 143 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 96 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.58 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.599 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.101 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5