The author of the argument suggests that, the student evaluation of professors at Omega University should be terminated so that its graduates will be able to land on sophisticated jobs in future. However, this argument is not based on clear evidence to support the fact.
The graduates not being successful at securing better jobs can also be due to factors like university curriculum being outdated and not on par with what industry asks for, or students being less interested in extra-curriculum activities which has caused to lack essential social and interpersonal skills the jobs need. Therefore, it needs to be found out through a university survey about what other social and environmental factors have changed in this 15 years after the new evaluation system is introduced.
Further, with the evidence of the survey, it can be identified if the problem of graduates being unable to secure better jobs is common to all graduates or for graduates in certain fields only. If so, more specific and long term measures, than author’s argument will be needed to address the issues in those subject curricula or exam structure.
Closely linked to the statement that professors have been assigning higher grades in their classes to earn better teaching evaluation from students, there is no evidence to support it. In actuality, the students have been performing well enough that professors have been assigning fair marks to everyone. And this can be verified from an appropriate university survey. If it is proven that professors have actually been assigning higher grades to students without a justifiable base, then it will provide a base to the author’s claim. Further evidence on this can be collected by revisiting the 15 year old student evaluation process of professors. If it is evident that some evaluation criteria are providing non-justifiable authority to students that is jeopardizing the professors job role, then measures can proposed to either improve the existing evaluation system or cancel it based on the impact.
By considering all these angles and factors, it is evident that more evidence and related information from the university community is needed to support the argument made by the author.
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station quot To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population gro 68
- 130 The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have fi 63
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 55
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 63
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall stu 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: IN_PAST
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...l be able to land on sophisticated jobs in future. However, this argument is not based on...
Line 7, column 536, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...l provide a base to the author’s claim. Further evidence on this can be collected by re...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, so, then, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 357.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26890756303 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92624460973 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526610644258 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 705.55239521 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6692800277 57.8364921388 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.692307692 119.503703932 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4615384615 23.324526521 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201951527024 0.218282227539 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819078612141 0.0743258471296 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073368276917 0.0701772020484 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978141216123 0.128457276422 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086897808576 0.0628817314937 138% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.3799401198 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.3550499002 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 357 350
No. of Characters: 1833 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.347 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.134 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.876 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.462 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.471 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.363 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.635 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.055 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5