In the preceding argument, the author claims that government of Zurzi's has to implement a small weekly tax for driving one's car downtown in order to mitigate the congestion, the conclusion is based in the following premises. Firstly, the author support his claim by giving a nearby city as an example has used the previous method to decrease the congestion. Secondly, he mentions that the lofe government raised much needed money for fixing their roads, by these methods they overcome the problem. Hence, in the first glance it may seem plausible. However, careful scrutiny sheds light on plethora of assumption that could undermine the value of the argument.
To begin with, the author stats in order to mitigate the congestion the Zurzi's government has to follow the Lofe state solutions by taxing the residents. Firstly, the author fails to describe the actual status for the Lofe area and how was the congestion?. Perhaps it was because they have narrow roads or perhaps their roads infrastructure very bad that cause the congestion. So, without complete details about the Lofe area we can not draw a broad conclusion about the Zurzi state.
Moreover, the author states that Lofe government implemented a small tax on the driver, but he fails to mention the amount of this tax, it will be effective with the Zurzi city even we do not have any information about the both cities economic status, perhaps Zurzi residents do not mind to pay the tax and continue use their cars and the congestion will be more. Thus, the second assumption lack a depth of details that would help to evaluate the significance of the argument.
Thirdly, the fallacy of the argument also lies in fact that the author mentioned about the Lofe government and maybe point out the source of the congestion, by raising their need to money in order to fix their roads, simply it might be the direct cause of congestion was the road status so by fixing it the congestion decrease gradually. Then, there is no evidence or information about the road status of Zurzi city and linking a solution has been used over a city and wait the same out comes for another one is not reliable.
In conclusion, the author fails to mention one single key factors. Namely, using Lofe city traffic solution to mitigate Zurzi congestion is not plausible and is not effective. So, without complete information the argument is unsubstantiated and opened to debate.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 411 350
No. of Characters: 1964 1500
No. of Different Words: 193 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.503 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.779 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.526 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.688 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.975 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.812 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.348 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.57 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... conclusion about the Zurzi state. Moreover, the author states that Lofe go...
^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fails to mention the amount of this tax, it will be effective with the Zurzi city...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mes for another one is not reliable. In conclusion, the author fails to menti...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, as to, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 16.3942115768 195% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 411.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9197080292 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6211009289 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493917274939 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.3390844288 57.8364921388 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.375 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 23.324526521 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.70786347227 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177785891247 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559649021217 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569148614288 0.0701772020484 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101766599115 0.128457276422 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280813690744 0.0628817314937 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.