tpo 19
The lecture and the reading passage both discuss the advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called buzzing. And the advertisers hire people, buzzers, their function to buzz products to people they know or meet. On one hand the reading states that this way of advertisements is not good and should banned them. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this by saying, these buzzing do not mislead people, and people take the truth about any product.
To begin with, the reading mentions that hiring a person being paid that will reflect an impression of misleading of people because will give them incorrect information to hidden a fact on product. However, the lecture argues that by saying, it differ from the ordinary advertisement because people have to pay in order to know the truth about any product.
Secondly, the reading emphasizes that consumers will listen to buzzers less critically than they should, and they will be highly suspicious of them. Conversely, the lecture refutes this claims by stating that buzzers will answer all the consumers questions such as the questions about price and services to ensure that they will buy the products.
Lastly, the reading makes argument is that buzzing will result a spread of mistrust and will have a harmful effect on social relationships. The lecture refutes that by pointing out the buzzing is a good experience and will let people more open to ask any questions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'differs'?
Suggestion: differs
..., the lecture argues that by saying, it differ from the ordinary advertisement because...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0460251046 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55237670511 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55230125523 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5147658764 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416736966862 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171897541515 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879646351448 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242641898836 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526861526932 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.