Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers, looking at this dramatic rise in grades, believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement; as a result, Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs, Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Management of omega university takes same stand as potential employers, the shot in the grades reported for students could be as a result of many factors which are not stayed in the argument, what was the evaluation aimed to addressed, prior to the implementation of the evaluation were graduates of omega university recording successful high recruitment etc.
Without these facts been clearly stated, it cannot be categorically said that their has been a change in the employment rate of graduates of omega university.
Initial grades of students is stated but assuming these grades were low, the argument does not mention it's cause, were the initial pedagogic employed by the professors ineffective, on implementation of student evaluation , did the professors improve on their teaching methods, which can in turn lead to improvement of the student grades
Comparing performance of grade of graduates from fifteen years ago to current graduates is totally presumptuous, students who graduated fifteen years ago could be mediocre while current students admitted considered based on them been natural high-flyers.
If these questions are not answered, terminating student evaluation will in no way change the stance of potential employers taken regarding student achievement reported by their grades
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 50
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 66
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times 60
- Recent incursions by deep sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population With the breeding season fast approaching the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase Nonetheless the po 70
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
... on implementation of student evaluation , did the professors improve on their tea...
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ead to improvement of the student grades Comparing performance of grade of gradua...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 11.1786427146 9% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 28.8173652695 35% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 2260.96107784 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 198.0 441.139720559 45% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59090909091 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.56307096286 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05207614729 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 204.123752495 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60101010101 0.468620217663 128% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 705.55239521 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 19.7664670659 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 49.0 22.8473053892 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 173.739028431 57.8364921388 300% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 276.75 119.503703932 232% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.5 23.324526521 212% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.70786347227 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333415242457 0.218282227539 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179615498827 0.0743258471296 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749251980787 0.0701772020484 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167612204448 0.128457276422 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056387917902 0.0628817314937 90% => OK
automated_readability_index: 29.6 14.3799401198 206% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 13.28 48.3550499002 27% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.1628742515 204% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.6 12.197005988 193% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.03 12.5979740519 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32208582834 128% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 98.500998004 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 12.3882235529 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.6 11.1389221557 194% => OK
text_standard: 30.0 11.9071856287 252% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 5 15
No. of Words: 198 350
No. of Characters: 1085 1500
No. of Different Words: 115 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.751 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.48 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.974 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 84 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 39.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 31.91 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.481 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.481 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.146 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5