The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
It is opined that Dr.Field conclusion from his observation-centered approach that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather by their own biological parents was wrong. However, Dr. Karp an anthropologist due to his further study on the culture of groups of islands with Tertia inclusive carrried out an interview-centered method rather than just observation approach done by Dr. Field. However, for Dr. Karp research to be considered valid enough to canter Dr.Field the following evidence would have to be analysed.
First of all, Dr.Field visitation to the island of Tertia was decades ago from the fact that it was stated twenty years ago could be the reason for his conclusion at that time. However, His conclusion can be considered anachronic but not spurious, as the category of parents he might have met may be the type that take everybody as theirs as long as the child lives in that island. So therefore, every child feels the love and attention all around the village, his observation-centered approach as at then could also be considered effective as at the time recorded.
In view of Dr. Karp recent findings that has not totally being concluded does not give enough ground for him to have stood against Dr. Field because his students research could eventually prove otherwise. This is possible from the fact that a larger polpulance from the island of Tertia and other island has not given their views yet, therefore a conclusion was not ment be drawn.
In conclusion, the assertion made by Dr, Field from his observation-centered approach that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather by their own biological parents was cantered by Dr. Karp an anthropologist due to his own further study on the culture of the Tertia and other island based on interview-centered method rather than just observation approach done by Dr. Field. However, for Dr. Karp research to be fully valid the above evidence would have to be seen.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
It is opined that Dr.Field conclusion from his observation-centere...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 478, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
...be considered valid enough to canter Dr.Field the following evidence would have to be...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
...have to be analysed. First of all, Dr.Field visitation to the island of Tertia was ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: SO_THEREFORE[1]
Message: Use simply 'So' or 'therefore'.
Suggestion: So; Therefore
...long as the child lives in that island. So therefore, every child feels the love and attenti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 328.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00609756098 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06031355196 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460365853659 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 705.55239521 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4926842046 57.8364921388 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.2 119.503703932 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 23.324526521 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430212864094 0.218282227539 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191364685511 0.0743258471296 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148306272414 0.0701772020484 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298400585305 0.128457276422 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145640612644 0.0628817314937 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.3799401198 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.3550499002 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 98.500998004 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
It is opined that Dr.Field conclusion from his observation-centere...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 478, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
...be considered valid enough to canter Dr.Field the following evidence would have to be...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Field
...have to be analysed. First of all, Dr.Field visitation to the island of Tertia was ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: SO_THEREFORE[1]
Message: Use simply 'So' or 'therefore'.
Suggestion: So; Therefore
...long as the child lives in that island. So therefore, every child feels the love and attenti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 328.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00609756098 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06031355196 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460365853659 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 705.55239521 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.4926842046 57.8364921388 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.2 119.503703932 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 23.324526521 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430212864094 0.218282227539 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191364685511 0.0743258471296 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148306272414 0.0701772020484 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298400585305 0.128457276422 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145640612644 0.0628817314937 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.3799401198 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.3550499002 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 98.500998004 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.