Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is asserted that restrictions on scientific research and devlopment should be placed by the government. However, this view would be strongly disagreed on, because a lot has being, yet to be dicovered. Restriction on research would definitely affect development negatively thereby putting the State in a stagnant or backward position. Research is ment to bring more enligtenment to the environment and emacipate us from an ingenous state. In view of this, the accertation on restriction-be it few- on secientific research is strongly disagreed for the following reasons.
First, without science living an healthy/ balanced life would be difficult-in the sense that what we eat & drink has some effect on our body system and to discover the positive and negative effects research has to be made. To prevent diseases due to consumption of deleterious items the need for more and in-depth research is inevitable. For example, from research on food to consume-it has being discover that consumption of food should be based on our blood type-to aviod future disturbances to our immune system.
Second, in cases of virues and flus, a lot our human eyes cannot see therefore the need of equipment that enhances the discovery of certain deleterious viruses that spring up. A constant research has to be done in other to fight all unwanted bodies in our environment. For example, Ebola virus in Nigeria was arrested due to research that was done on it eradication and still research has to keeping going on to avoid future occurances.
In conclusion the assertation that restrictions on scientific research and development should be placed by the government-be it few, is strongly disagreed on, because a lot has being, yet to be discovered. Restriction on research would definitely affect development thereby putting the State in a stagnant or backward position compared to other States. In view of this, the accertation on restriction-be it few- on scientific research is strongly disagreed from the above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...easons. First, without science living an healthy/ balanced life would be difficu...
^^
Line 2, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ture disturbances to our immune system. Second, in cases of virues and flus, a l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'constant research'.
Suggestion: Constant research
...ain deleterious viruses that spring up. A constant research has to be done in other to fight all un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ongly disagreed from the above reasons.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24844720497 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09111383029 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475155279503 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6279251158 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169685551628 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768407114198 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571975093763 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119340618591 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719784681349 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.