As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is asserted that the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate due to their reliance on technology to solve problems. However, reliance on technology by humans may not prove to be the only factor causing deterioration in human thinking. Some other factors may affect human thinking which may have not being analysed. To base our view our thinking that technology causes a deleterious impact to our human mind is a fact to be strongly disagreed with unless certain other factor has being seen to reviewed. Therefore, human thinking can detriortiate due to many- other environmetal factors like, societal pressure, illness and drugs, also looking at the fact that humans are the inventors of the aforementioned technology, problems solved today may lead to another which would require human thinking to improve the situation, so therfore increase in thinking level is inspired.
First, looking at the environs were a lot of societal pressure take place is alarming, making a lot of people to be isolated from some realitist of life. Societal pressure can also limit human level of thinking as we base out life on what others think of say about us, therby doing this they want it done. For instance, working at a bakery where different types of bread can be produce to soothe the human taste but due to the insturction from managemnet to focus on just one methos a limitation to what the human mind can actually nauscent.
Second, the rate of consumption of drugs by the youth can be an alarming deterioration to the state at which they think. Consumption of annabies and some other drugs has being a main cause of mental dysfunction to the mind. From my obsevravtion of a lot of drop out in schools, it shas majorly being as a result of involvemnt in drugs from early age, leading to more engaement in unwanted activities in the society.This can also be a major source of human thinking deterioration in the youths in specific.
Also, to mention that technology reduces our task as humans is undenialable as that was the essence of its invention but a lot has yet to be invented to reduce task. The technology invented by humans has yet reached its apex, mind detriortion is not equivocal to the present hunger for more advanced ways to get things done. For instance, in the telecommunication sector like the iphone, new products with new features topnotches everytime, in view of its present high quality, a better feature can be added in the next product making communication better and easier but not human level of thinking decreasing.
Conclusively, in view of the aforementioned instances which highlights the fact that technology may not necessarily be the core cause of human thinking deterioration and the fact also that technology descoveries has not reached its apex our human mind cannot be said to easily deterirate be cause as one problem is solved by the technology invented today another arises needing a new, advanced technology which requires human reasoning.
In conclusion,from the assertion that the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate due to their reliance on technology to solve problems is strong disagreed with. However, since reliance on technology by humans may not be the only factor causing deterioration in human thinking,some other factors that can affect human thinking which may have not being analysed ahs being reviewd above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...imit human level of thinking as we base out life on what others think of say about ...
^^^
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one metho', 'a metho', or simply 'methos'?
Suggestion: one metho; a metho; methos
...rction from managemnet to focus on just one methos a limitation to what the human mind can...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun drop seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of drops'.
Suggestion: a lot of drops
...on to the mind. From my obsevravtion of a lot of drop out in schools, it shas majorly being a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...t in unwanted activities in the society.This can also be a major source of human thi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eterioration in the youths in specific. Also, to mention that technology reduces...
^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...ind cannot be said to easily deterirate be cause as one problem is solved by the technol...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hnology which requires human reasoning. In conclusion,from the assertion that th...
^^^^
Line 6, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , from
...uires human reasoning. In conclusion,from the assertion that the ability of human...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , some
... causing deterioration in human thinking,some other factors that can affect human thi...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...being analysed ahs being reviewd above.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 94.0 58.6224719101 160% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2851.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 568.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01936619718 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90185656922 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43485915493 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 917.1 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.530188676 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.705882353 118.986275619 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4117647059 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246170318461 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108015177982 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927844440641 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150828042828 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684200064567 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.