The arguement presented by Dr. Karp in article, the interview centered approach follwed by his team of graduate students is better than observation centered approach followed by Dr. Field to accurately understand the child rearing tradition on Tertia island and on other islands, may me true but it should be re-evaluated with certain pluasible holes presented in argument to propose his claim. In the following passage, we have discussed about the holes present in the argument and how would it affect the conclusion.
Firstly, the research carried by Dr. Field was about twenty years ago. It might be possible that his observation centered approach might not be the most effective one but comparing it with the the research done after 20 years and calling it invalid might be wrong. The traditions might have changed. Secondly, whats the probability that the children which were interviewed in the interview centered approach most accurately represent the children of tertia as a whole. They might be from a minority of population which were reared by there biological parents.Thirdly, What types of questions were are asked in the interview are not mentioned here. The question asked by the graduate student might evok feelings about there parents and inturn they talked more about there biological parents. That dosn't necessarily mean they were reared by there biological parents.
Assumimg that the interview centered approach is better, What are the chances that it might very well represent the traditional culture of other islands as well. The proof to this arguement is also missing.
Therefore, above arguements should be considered and the claim should should be re-evaluated, mentioned in the prompt.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ost effective one but comparing it with the the research done after 20 years and callin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ost effective one but comparing it with the the research done after 20 years and callin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...raditions might have changed. Secondly, whats the probability that the children which...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thirdly
...were reared by there biological parents.Thirdly, What types of questions were are asked...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: should
...ents should be considered and the claim should should be re-evaluated, mentioned in the promp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 272.0 441.139720559 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33088235294 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77305334009 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 705.55239521 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.5537182933 57.8364921388 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153273366236 0.218282227539 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553888730449 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620962746505 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749224284146 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674906710358 0.0628817314937 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 98.500998004 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ost effective one but comparing it with the the research done after 20 years and callin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ost effective one but comparing it with the the research done after 20 years and callin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...raditions might have changed. Secondly, whats the probability that the children which...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thirdly
...were reared by there biological parents.Thirdly, What types of questions were are asked...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: should
...ents should be considered and the claim should should be re-evaluated, mentioned in the promp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 272.0 441.139720559 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33088235294 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77305334009 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 705.55239521 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.5537182933 57.8364921388 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153273366236 0.218282227539 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553888730449 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620962746505 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749224284146 0.128457276422 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674906710358 0.0628817314937 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.3799401198 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 98.500998004 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.