Plausibly the the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and rectify the negative ones and improve upon it. I would partially disagree with the above issue. In the following paragraph we will discuss about points due to which I partially disagree with prompt. We will also discuss about the the counter arguement one might present.
Firstly, If one ignore the negative actions like mistakes and the actions which are distracting them, they might not be able rectify and improve upon them. Lets take an example of a person who is preparing from the GRE exam. If the teacher do not rectify the problems he is repeatedly doing in the exam or things he/she is involved in which are making him distracted, them he very well might not be able to improve. If he/she is only praised about the positive things he is doing and not told to bother about the negatives ones, he will be at the same level after 2-3 months of preparation compared to when he started the preparation. Because he/she was never encouraged to see the negative action affecting his/her progress.
One might argue that ignoring the negatives actions of the learner and praising only the positive actions will help motivate the candidate more and if he is told about the negative ones he will be discouraged. Perhaps this may be partially true, however, the most important thing for the teacher to do, for improving upon the thing the candidate is doing wrong, is to help them identify the mistakes they are doing and motivate them to correct them instead of let them discouraged from it.
Therefore, considering the above arguements, the best possible way to tech would probably to indentify the negative actions and help improve it and correspondinglr prasing the positive action.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
Plausibly the the best way to teach is to praise positive...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
Plausibly the the best way to teach is to praise positive...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...with prompt. We will also discuss about the the counter arguement one might present. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...with prompt. We will also discuss about the the counter arguement one might present. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... be able rectify and improve upon them. Lets take an example of a person who is prep...
^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...red to when he started the preparation. Because he/she was never encouraged to see the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87333333333 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55059905817 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493333333333 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.668062187 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202537294053 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938186180277 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686488592144 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148279705381 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554812090566 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
Plausibly the the best way to teach is to praise positive...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
Plausibly the the best way to teach is to praise positive...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...with prompt. We will also discuss about the the counter arguement one might present. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...with prompt. We will also discuss about the the counter arguement one might present. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... be able rectify and improve upon them. Lets take an example of a person who is prep...
^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...red to when he started the preparation. Because he/she was never encouraged to see the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87333333333 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55059905817 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493333333333 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.668062187 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202537294053 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938186180277 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686488592144 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148279705381 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554812090566 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.