The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement claims that the best method of teaching is to praise the people for their positive deeds and ignore the negatives actions done by them. I partially agree with this statement and believe that rewarding is helpful to maintain the positive attitude in people however, ignoring negative actions may lead to serious consequences.
Firstly, praising a person for the positive thing he does creates a sense of positive vibe and he would continue following the same path in the future. For instance, a student who scored highest marks in the class would receive lots of appreciation from his teachers and his friends. this would make him work harder to keep up the same place. similarly, an employe when he receive accolades from his manager for the project he has done, he would try his best in order to keep up the same spirit in all the future projects. Therefore, rewarding a people for their positive actions is necessary.
Secondly, ignoring a person for his negative actions creates a sense of superiority in him and he feels that nobody would question him for the fault he has done. For example, when a child steals other’s belongings, he should be educated on the mistake he committed. this would give him knowledge on the things he has to do and things which he should not do. if neglected, the child will continue to follow the same path and may take a bad path in his career. Therefore, when a child commits a mistake he should be told softly instead of ignoring him and if adults commit the same mistake they should be punished as they already have knowledge on what to do and what not to do.
To summarise, I consider that a person should receive appreciation when he does some positive action as it instills in him a sense of good attitude to carry on good deeds. similarly, he should not be ignored when he committed a mistake as it creates a feeling of superiority over others which leads him to a wrong path in his career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'scored the highest'.
Suggestion: scored the highest
...the future. For instance, a student who scored highest marks in the class would receive lots o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...tion from his teachers and his friends. this would make him work harder to keep up t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
... work harder to keep up the same place. similarly, an employe when he receive accolades f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'receives'.
Suggestion: receives
...me place. similarly, an employe when he receive accolades from his manager for the proj...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e educated on the mistake he committed. this would give him knowledge on the things ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 683, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ledge on what to do and what not to do. To summarise, I consider that a person s...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...f good attitude to carry on good deeds. similarly, he should not be ignored when he commi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68497109827 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56723710209 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447976878613 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1065066124 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147781864292 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710442145368 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699794554121 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12206721695 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084575910741 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.