The author of the reading suggests solutions by which a tree named Torreya can be saved by getting extinct. However, the lecturer asserts that none of the solutions mentioned by the author will be able to provide a fruitful result.
First, the author in the reading states that the solution is to reestablish Torreya in the same microclimate - wetter and cooler than surrounding dry and warm climate - in which it once used to flourish. The lecturer disagrees. She says that the environmental condition in microclimate have changed significantly over the years than the past when these trees used to thrive in it. It has become less cold and wet. She adds that it can be due to changes in surrounding larger region temperature or may be global warming or the drying of wetlands in whole Florida region.
Second, the author claims that if we can shift the Torreya to the north form the microclimate location where it will be cooler. It is expected that it can thrive here. Again, the lecturer refutes the suggestion. She goes on to say that once similar thing has been done. The Black Locust trees were one on the verge of extinction and were shifted to other location, so that they can thrive. It spread so fast that they killed other species of trees too which were in itself on the edge of survival. Therefore, this type of technique should be rejected because it can have unpredicted outcomes.
Finally, the author contends that they should be preserved in research centers where they can be protected. However, the lecturer states that there is flaw in this recommendation. She says that in order to survive a disease by a particular species of tree they need diversity. Such type of environment can't be provided in the research center. It is only possible for them to be diversified in a large area of land like forests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eed diversity. Such type of environment cant be provided in the research center. It ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78233438486 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6693668912 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526813880126 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.517461871 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7894736842 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6842105263 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.89473684211 7.06452816374 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111671413621 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349916189416 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314676606721 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721100444231 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244273939215 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.