The author of the letter argues that moped accidents have increased in Balmer island during the summer months. He also claims that reducing rental mopeds can reduce these accidents to 50% based on the system adopted by Seaville. However,
there is no strong evidence and argument is open to further debate.
The author claimed that Seaville reduced the number of rental mopeds which resulted in fewer accidents. The author failed to consider other factors responsible for the downfall of moped accidents. For example, Seaville might have developed different paths for bicycles and mopeds, the footpath might be at a considerable distance from the road, the tourists were educated about the rules and regulations before renting a moped, etc. The number of tourists in Seaville might be less which resulted in fewer accidents. The author also fails to consider the environmental condition of Balmer and Seaville. Balmer might have more slopes and must have more ups and downs which in turn results in more accidents.
The author must provide a survey regarding the number of tourists involved in accidents versus the number of residents involved in accidents. It is possible that reducing the number of rental mopeds will not reduce the number of accidents if resident mopeds are involved in these accidents. Reducing the number of mopeds rented may result in increased pedestrians on the road which again may increase the probability of accidents. As there is no strong evidence the author's
the argument is open to more debate.
The author must provide strong evidence like a survey showing the number of rental mopeds involved in accidents, geographical conditions of Balmer and Seaville, etc. Thus the argument does not have enough evidence and is weak.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1447 1500
No. of Different Words: 124 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.095 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.497 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.324 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.435 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.604 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.141 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich in turn results in more accidents. The author must provide a survey regardi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... increase the probability of accidents. As there is no strong evidence the authors...
^^
Line 4, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... there is no strong evidence the authors the argument is open to more debate. ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the argument is open to more debate. The author must provide strong evidence ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 28.8173652695 28% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 284.0 441.139720559 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21478873239 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56549547076 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 204.123752495 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450704225352 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9130386816 57.8364921388 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.70786347227 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214090565221 0.218282227539 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884205004734 0.0743258471296 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103455984379 0.0701772020484 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112390714767 0.128457276422 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111818856692 0.0628817314937 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.