Scandal is that crime which is present in every country and is caused because of greed and to be famous amongst society. The author argues that scandals are useful as they focus our attention on secluded issues which cannot be covered by reformers or speakers. I somewhat agree with the claim as it does focuses on important issues but sometimes news channels or other media use it for their own benefit and fail to take further action to minimize the issue.
Certain sectors in the system are not open to citizens of the country and hence people are not aware of wear and tear of the system. Exposing scandals in such system is useful to bring about some issues which cannot be covered by reformers or speakers. For example, Recently Congress leader has claimed that the current prime minister of India is involved in Rafael fighter plane scandal and which brought the cabalistic side of the military operations and has questioned the integrity of the work at higher levels. However, there is no confirmation of the claim and investigation is still in progress but it had brought some hidden working culture in front of the people which was out of any speaker or reformers reach.
The media channels try to cover the scandals for a small period of time and do not make sure about the changes to be brought to avoid such scandals or to bring more stability in the system. Scandals are thus fleeting and do not have strong impact that a reformer or a speaker has to bring about the change in the system. A speaker or reformer is focused on the issue and bring about the problems of the citizens and fight until actions are taken to bring in the changes. For example, one of the social reformer named Anna Hazare decided to fight against corruption and bring about changes to reduce the issues. The issue was widely covered by the news channel for a certain amount of time and then their focus switched after some time, however, he did not give up and was successful to bring about the change that he was hoping.
In conclusion, The scandal is effective or useful to focus our attention on a particular issue where reformer or speaker could not reach. However, the focus on scandals is short-lived and cannot guarantee to bring in the change to avoid further such scenarios.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s try to cover the scandals for a small period of time and do not make sure about the changes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, so, still, then, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66169154229 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3762091952 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455223880597 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8633328863 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237343057652 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997306612041 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765725490265 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172882455105 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069540469442 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.