The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University: A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for the

Faculty committee has given recommendation of implementing free-tuition policy for their professors to enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors. The recommendation is based on the fact that similar implementation of policy works in Oceania University. After speculation it can be seen that the facts on which argument is based upon has many fallacies.

The argument is based on the fact that study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is high when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-ages children. There can be many reasons for implementing such policy in Oceania. May be Oceania University has very less staff and they are also leaving the college University has lured them by giving incentive to offer free tuition for their children. Maybe Oceania is not very good University and to offer good education to children faculty members are moving out to other place So, Oceania is offering such policy. Many interpretations can be made about the facts. So, facts is not enough to tell whether policy is successful in Oceania or not.

If policy is successful in Oceania University, implementing the similar policy in Seatown Unversity will not guarnatee that will give similar result. Since, two universities are different. If the reason behind implenting policy, type of university and if they similar in every ascpect then only it would have give the desired result.

If implenting policy will successful in Seatown University it would only help to retain the professors. So to assuming that free-tuiton policy for its professors will enhancing morale among the faculty is wrong.The study in Ocean university has only mentioned that the policy helped them in retention professor. They hasn't mentioned any thing about whether policy has mentioned professor morale or
has helped to lure new professors.

In sum, argument lacks support needed to evaluate the argument, it fails to make convincing case that policy will serve the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professor in Seatwon

Votes
Average: 6.1 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of policy works in Oceania University. After speculation it can be seen that the fac...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uarnatee that will give similar result. Since, two universities are different. If the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... would have give the desired result. If implenting policy will successful in Se...
^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'enhance'
Suggestion: enhance
...e-tuiton policy for its professors will enhancing morale among the faculty is wrong.The s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ncing morale among the faculty is wrong.The study in Ocean university has only ment...
^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...elped them in retention professor. They hasnt mentioned any thing about whether polic...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...tention professor. They hasnt mentioned any thing about whether policy has mentioned prof...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 2260.96107784 79% => OK
No of words: 334.0 441.139720559 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33233532934 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85534732643 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 204.123752495 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461077844311 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6148088319 57.8364921388 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3125 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4375 5.70786347227 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338578066513 0.218282227539 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115440798564 0.0743258471296 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130507136257 0.0701772020484 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14197309217 0.128457276422 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120944569368 0.0628817314937 192% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.3799401198 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.3550499002 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 98.500998004 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 336 350
No. of Characters: 1740 1500
No. of Different Words: 150 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.281 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.179 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.802 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.765 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.334 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.412 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.366 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.617 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.137 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5