The article disscusses the origins of the first Americans known as the Clovis-first theory and supports for three reasons. However, the professors doesn't agree with the article's claim and refutes reach of the reason.
First, the article states that people migrate to Beringia at the time of last iceage i.e. 11000 or 13000 year ago. However, the professor refute this point by stating that on site remains have seen much older than the clovis period i.e. 900 years ago.
Second, the article states that people have migrated to Berginia form Eastern Asia and North America. However, the professor refutes this point by stating that people migrated to South America from South Chile and it happend neary 15000 years ago. It can be evaluated from the old remains that people not only cam efrom North America but from the wide range of places kie Siberia, Japan, etc,.
Third, the artcile avers that Clovis tools demonstrate their presence throughout the continent. Howver, the professor undermine this claim by stating that through DNA analysis it can be proved that there were people on the continet nearly 40 years before the clovis period. Different group habited the continent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... three reasons. However, the professors doesnt agree with the articles claim and refut...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... range of places kie Siberia, Japan, etc,. Third, the artcile avers that Clovis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12371134021 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19330956907 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2193318547 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188493755341 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738705431959 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570321039371 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107485103923 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452793688495 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.