The article states that invaders are responsible for the decimination of Easter Isalanders and supported it with three reasons. However, the professor doesn't approve this theory for destuction of Easter Isalanders and refutes each of the three reasons.
First, the article states that invaders were responsible for the disapperance of trees on the island. However, the professor doesn't think so and refutes this point by stating that diffrent communities present over the island want to prove their cultural dominance and to show their dominance they form statues which were travelled using tree logs. In that process more and more trees were get cut down. So, competition between the communities were responsible for the destrcution of trees over the island
Second, the article avers that dicovery of spear tips and skeltletons from that time shows that their would have been combat between the islanders and invaders. However, to cast doubt on this claim the professor states that spear tips were not formed for the combat but for the defensive purpose. Due to depeltion of food resources on the island there was civil war between the diffrent communities for the limited resources.
Third, the article claims that new birdman religion proves that invading forves had occupied a new territory with its customs, culture and religion. However, the professor discard this claim by staing that new religion were formed by islanders not by the invaders. Due to difficult times such as war and family issues islanders facing on island they think that current religion is not sufficient to provide them necessary solution and this need gives rise to new birdman religion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...h three reasons. However, the professor doesnt approve this theory for destuction of E...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s on the island. However, the professor doesnt think so and refutes this point by stat...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...n that process more and more trees were get cut down. So, competition between the c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25746268657 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52663192843 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507462686567 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2228013485 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.090909091 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170823042445 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727101056397 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469424276195 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104180148173 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116600817217 0.0443174109184 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.