Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? There is nothing that an uneducated person can teach an educated person.Use specific reasons and examples.

Learning is continuous process. We can learn things from every small things which happend to us or from our experience. Teaching is not always related to education. It is not true to state that we can learn things from educated people only. So, I disagree with the statement that uneducated person can not teach anything to educated person for the following reasons.

It is not necessary that educated person have the all the skills. Skill are developed by practice and sometimes the skill which person has are inherited. So a person with good skillset will definetely teach important things rather than a person with only thoretical knowledge. For example, when I was a child, a painter used to live nearby our house. He was very good painter. Everyone's felt overlwhelm when they sae their paintings. I also had interest in painting, so enrolled for the painting class. The peron who used to teach painting class was also good painter but he wasn't that much skilled. One day when I was returning from my class, I stoped to visit the painter and I showed him my paintings. He said to me that my painting were good but still had scope for the improvement. He also give me the suggestions for how to use painting and how to draw the rough sketch. So, a good person with skillset is lot more useful rather than person with education.

Like the good old saying Experience is the good teacher. No one can deny that. So definetly the person with experience will be more valuable because he has experinced that things before and will help to guide us in more practical way. For example, my grandmother she is not educated. We have generation gap but still she has the solution for my every question. After completing my school study it was time for me to field for my graduation. I was not sure whether to opt for biology because I am more intersetd in biology or to opt for engineering in computer science because I was good at programming. I went her just to talk casually about the hows my life going after the school. She saw me and tell just decide the thing which will make you happy and have future.

In sum, anyone with good skill and experience can teach us impotant things. Its not true to say that only educated peron has the ability to teach things to others.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...nd sometimes the skill which person has are inherited. So a person with good skills...
^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hen they sae their paintings. I also had interest in painting, so enrolled for th...
^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ting class was also good painter but he wasnt that much skilled. One day when I was r...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 797, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
... had scope for the improvement. He also give me the suggestions for how to use paint...
^^^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: how's
...ent her just to talk casually about the hows my life going after the school. She saw...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58722358722 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47959392748 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481572481572 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6879767886 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.6785714286 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5357142857 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.32142857143 5.45110844103 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191542495449 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580587948031 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948678228772 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144896657909 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752761476689 0.0645574589148 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 11.7677419355 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.75 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.