The artcicle states that dowsing is useful technique for finding hidden things and support it with three reasons. However, the professor doesn't think so, she thinks that the dowsing should be evaluated using the empirical evidence.
First, the article states that dowsers are able to find out the correct location of underground water just by concerntating on certain frequencies. However, the professor thinks that such claim is not right. she thinks that it is not wise to accept such result without questions. She further states that it is against the law of physics.
Second, the article avers that dowsing tool twist and jerk or suddenly point downward indicating the place to start digging. However, to refute this claim professor states that extraordinary claims require exceptional evidence. She gives the example of the devicve used to detect unknown object to prove his point. She explains that due to weak signal it is not able to detect the object. Also she states that so it is not possible to find excat location using dowsing.
Third, the artcile states that dowsers have the skill to uncover not only water but also other objects including buried treasure, oil, or even deadbodies. However, the professor states that dowsing is just the hypothesis. The success of dowsers is just depends on random luck. He sad that dowsers work is similar as the hunching for the things. Dowsers work without conditions and sometimes it can lead to success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...h three reasons. However, the professor doesnt think so, she thinks that the dowsing s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...or thinks that such claim is not right. she thinks that it is not wise to accept su...
^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...al it is not able to detect the object. Also she states that so it is not possible t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08713692946 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46692973661 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55601659751 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.185871701 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.625 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0625 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 7.06452816374 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161738654979 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531640445179 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385771411412 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104131639732 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216909626745 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.