The article discuss about the benefit of the rewards to increase productivity and gives three eaxmple to support the it. However; the professor doesn't agree with the article claim and refute each of the reason.
First, the article states that rewards improved the productivity. To refute this point, the professor explain that many people doesn't like the reward and people prefer to be get paid for the work and wants respect for working hard.
Second, the article avers that rewards improve the performance of the employee. However, the professor believes that rewards has counter effect on the productivity and it decrease the productivity of the employee. He further explains that employees think that rewards are manipulating them. Rewards are similar to punishment. If the employee didn't get the reward for his work then it is similar to punishment.
Third, the article states that people needs external motivation to be set in motion. The professor cast doubt and states that rewards has negative impact on the reltionship between the manager and employees. If the employee has any problem then he will not ask his subordinate or supervisor due to the feeling of geting lower rating and this will affect on his quality of performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...vity and gives three eaxmple to support the it. However; the professor doesnt agree w...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... gives three eaxmple to support the it. However; the professor doesnt agree with the a...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hree eaxmple to support the it. However; the professor doesnt agree with the arti...
^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...support the it. However; the professor doesnt agree with the article claim and refute...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... the professor explain that many people doesnt like the reward and people prefer to b...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rofessor explain that many people doesnt like the reward and people prefer to be ...
^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...unter effect on the productivity and it decrease the productivity of the employee. He fu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... similar to punishment. If the employee didnt get the reward for his work then it is ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ng of geting lower rating and this will affect on his quality of performance.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15763546798 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63738708268 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527093596059 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0860186211 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.25 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374736209607 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156701095122 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136680679678 0.0662205650399 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22292703192 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157991299693 0.0443174109184 356% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.