Productivity and Rewards
In the lecture, the lecturer cast doubts on the idea that in business management, reward will increase motivation and productivity of the employee which was mentioned in the reading passage.
First of all, the lecturer claims that employee often don't like to get rewarded rather they prefer the increased pay on salary. Specially the reading passage argues that reward will improves employee attitudes, motivation and productivity. However, the lecturer refutes by saying that reward might publish sometimes. He further argues that as company tries to compensate the work, the employee perceive as being controlled or manipulated.
Secondly, the lecturer contradicts to the idea of reading passage that offering reward and incentives might reduce quality. According to the passage, the reward might be perceived as high value and it should be in reach to that person. However, the lecturer suggests that it might damage the relationship with the supervisor as the employee are less likely to ask supervisor to avoid the negative rating.
Lastly, the reading suggests that sometime motivation effect will be lower when a person strive for the reward. The lecture also agrees somehow saying the reward will be counterproductive.Moreover, they prefer to get respect rather than reward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the lecture, the lecturer cast doubts...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the lecturer claims that employee often dont like to get rewarded rather they prefer...
^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'improve'
Suggestion: improve
...reading passage argues that reward will improves employee attitudes, motivation and prod...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ng the reward will be counterproductive.Moreover, they prefer to get respect rather than...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50251256281 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05957116814 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547738693467 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1595755938 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285054262423 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117254440639 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719874750621 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181178820508 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483068450766 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.