The argument is replete with unwarranted assumptions such as assuming 98 out of 100 people are happy with margarine, people use the term ‘butter’ to refer either butter or margarine and more. Deriving a conclusion based on these assumptions makes the argument fall apart.
The argument has mentioned that only about 2 percent of customers have complained and so it assumes that remaining 98 out of 100 customers are happy with the change. If only two percent customers have complained, that doesn’t mean that remaining customers are happy with the change. In the fast running world, only so...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 481 350
No. of Characters: 2419 1500
No. of Different Words: 218 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.683 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.029 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.612 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 185 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 86 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.316 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.658 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.632 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.368 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.56 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.16 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 683, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'support'
Suggestion: support
...aints are less, then the argument could supported its claim. Stating the comparison witho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 196, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'missed providing'.
Suggestion: missed providing
...ability. First of all, the argument has missed to provide the cost comparison of butter and marga...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2541.0 2260.96107784 112% => OK
No of words: 477.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32704402516 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89094959866 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 204.123752495 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475890985325 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 705.55239521 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6060098183 57.8364921388 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.736842105 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1052631579 23.324526521 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.70786347227 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193462989155 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691848173794 0.0743258471296 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763472967527 0.0701772020484 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109938562525 0.128457276422 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651980211542 0.0628817314937 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.3799401198 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 98.500998004 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.