Author of this recommendation assume that in order to improve overall productivity of Acme Publishing, its employees should take the Easy Read course. As arguments, author uses some success stories of recent course graduate and assume that benefits of the training overshadow it’s price. While author suggestion may be logical, it will require more thought and data to warrant any action.
<!--break--> Firstly, as example of Easy Read course effectiveness, author provide a story about recent graduate that rose from assistant manager to vice president in a year. While course could helped him, there is no information about preexisting skills and experience of this graduate. Maybe his excellent education and deep knowledge of a business provided such success? Author provide no argument, that ability to read and absorb more information fast is the reason of his promotion.
<!--break--> Another assumption author makes is that Acme’s employees productivity will improve after Easy Read course. We don’t have any information about type of their work and how absorbing more information in reduced amount time will help them to work faster and better. Do they really need this ability? Maybe typical workday of Acme Publishing employee does not require them to work with information, thought Easy Read course will be useless for them. Some data about Acme Publishing workers with examples how their productivity can be improve could bolster author’s argument.
<!--break--> Finally, author states that 500$ per employee is a small pay for the benefits this course will bring. While we don’t have any information about size of a Acme Publishing Company, we cannot conclude how big the total expenses this recommendation will bring. It is quite possible, that Acme Publishing is a huge corporation with thousands of employees, so in total, 500$ per each worker is a huge amount of money. Author should provide financial analysis in order to fully understand overall costs of this project.
<!--break--> Overall, author of recommendation fails to provide valid arguments and convince that Easy Read course is necessity to Acme Publishing Company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Author of this recommendation assume tha...
^^^
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ata to warrant any action.
Firstly, as example of Easy Read course ...
^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...president in a year. While course could helped him, there is no information about pree...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reason of his promotion.
Another assumption author makes is that ...
^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r author's argument.
Finally, author states that 500$ per emp...
^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...-break--> Finally, author states that 500$ per employee is a small pay for the ben...
^^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...os;t have any information about size of a Acme Publishing Company, we cannot conc...
^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...th thousands of employees, so in total, 500$ per each worker is a huge amount of mon...
^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll costs of this project.
Overall, author of recommendation fails ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, may, really, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 337.0 441.139720559 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45994065282 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89408035749 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 204.123752495 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513353115727 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 705.55239521 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1699396412 57.8364921388 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.235294118 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76470588235 5.70786347227 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265401740303 0.218282227539 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891358897315 0.0743258471296 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073866363825 0.0701772020484 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16447915105 0.128457276422 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431820601732 0.0628817314937 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.