Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.

Claim asserts that imagination is more valuable than experience as novice without experience have open minds and they are free to imagine what is possible without constraint of established habits. Generally, I disagree with that position, because I consider experience is very valuable in every field.
For sure, people without practical knowledge of something can have free minds, without restrains from habits and established attitudes about what is possible and what’s not. History know some examples of cloth designers, who weren’t tailors and know nothing about what is considered possible to create from tailors point of view. Their minds weren’t bounded and prototypes they created were considered impossible to mass-produce. However, it turns out that there is a way to sew those outfits and due to its freshness and unique style those collections were very high appraised and it was all because designers lacked experience in tailoring and were free to imagine.
However, I believe that it is rare example and mostly dilettante with no experience cannot invent anything worthy. With many trials, people learn and find out good or bad ways in doing something. It is not just established habits and attitudes that define experienced person and bound him in his position. It is thousands of observations, practical experience, long thoughts and calculations about the subject. Imagination cannot replace all that.
In the past, people dreamed to fly or create a device that can helps to do so . Many great minds tried to make this dream come true. Even Leonardo Da Vinci had a prototypes of a flying machine, not to count hundreds of others dreamers and inventors. They imagined a lot how a man can fly, there were different theories what is the best way to build such machine. However all those dreamers failed to produce working mechanism, some of them even died trying to use trier device. Only later, when human had knowledge about gravity, dynamics and other important things, only then people found a way to build a first plain. It took a lot of experience from previous failures, knowledge of field-related facts and a lot of hard work.
To conclude, I believe that experience is critical in almost every field as it prevents mistakes and give understanding of how things will or will not work. Even if there are some examples of people who become successful only with power of imagination, I consider them as lucky outliers from an overall amount of those who failed to archive their goals without proper experience.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
...s possible and what's not. History know some examples of cloth designers, who w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... create a device that can helps to do so . Many great minds tried to make this dre...
^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a prototype' or simply 'prototypes'?
Suggestion: a prototype; prototypes
...m come true. Even Leonardo Da Vinci had a prototypes of a flying machine, not to count hundr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 363, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... is the best way to build such machine. However all those dreamers failed to produce wo...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1175059952 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7794678029 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551558752998 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9763670734 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.7 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30446362995 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075821005594 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113926641331 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176480310223 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135909961166 0.0667264976115 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.