In this paragraph, the author claim that human cannot a reason of extinction of mammal species that went extinct within 3000 years since arrived 7000 years ago and human are no responsible. because no significant contact found with human to mammal extinction. Further, there have been found fish bone but not large mammals. This argument seems to be unconvincing and there is no supporting evidence.
First, Author claim that, extinction of mammal species within 3,000 years after human arrive on Kaliko Islands and human are not responsible for this. because no evidence found any significant human and mammal species. This argument is seems to be unconvincing and not adequately presented. For example,Behind the mammal extinction, there might be many reason behind this, it may be cause of human carry virus to the Kaliko Islands so that mammals was dead by this diseases. Moreover, deforestation could have great problem foe the species, it reduce their food and destroy living place.
Second, the author say that while in some sites fish bones had been discovered, large mammals bones were not found, assuming that because of this, human could not have hunted them. Again this argument is sees to be week and unconvincing and there is no clear evidence of this. There might be may reason of this, one of them is mammal displacement from the hunting site because of shortage of food. Fish could have great food for mammal species. If author maintained these reason then it will make strong argument proof.
Finally, author concludes that environment change was a reason of mammal extinction. But author failed to account possible reason of environment change could had been damage by the human activity like deforestation, hunting fish, fire, water and air condition etc. So, this arguments was unwarranted conclusion humans did not cause of environmental changes.
In conclusion, author failed to give a possible reason and example, this arguments is weaken and there is no clear supporting evidence.
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- duplicated
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 326 350
No. of Characters: 1639 1500
No. of Different Words: 151 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.249 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.028 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.515 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 74 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.733 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.21 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.368 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.572 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...years ago and human are no responsible. because no significant contact found with human...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...ears ago and human are no responsible. because no significant contact found with human...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...and human are not responsible for this. because no evidence found any significant human...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Behind
...nd not adequately presented. For example,Behind the mammal extinction, there might be m...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 381, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...ight be many reason behind this, it may be cause of human carry virus to the Kaliko Isla...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...iko Islands so that mammals was dead by this diseases. Moreover, deforestation could...
^^^^
Line 4, column 545, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
... have great problem foe the species, it reduce their food and destroy living place. ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uld have great food for mammal species. If author maintained these reason then it ...
^^
Line 8, column 270, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... fire, water and air condition etc. So, this arguments was unwarranted conclusion hu...
^^^^
Line 10, column 69, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... to give a possible reason and example, this arguments is weaken and there is no cle...
^^^^
Line 10, column 87, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'weakened'.
Suggestion: weakened
...e reason and example, this arguments is weaken and there is no clear supporting eviden...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... there is no clear supporting evidence.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 325.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22153846154 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65659122243 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492307692308 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3447894177 57.8364921388 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2777777778 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.70786347227 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254161244239 0.218282227539 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842913372812 0.0743258471296 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109816893202 0.0701772020484 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142913746868 0.128457276422 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10842458302 0.0628817314937 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.