Improving biodiversity and ensuring a healthy enviroment is a critical factor in the sustainability of our planet. Even biodviersity and healthy enviroment serves as one of the United Nations' sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This shows the importance of maintaining a healthy enviroment. In order to evaluate this argument, it is imperative to consider the effect of building roads along the edge of wetlands of West Lansburg. Looking at a region that has experienced similar development can help throw some lights into this argument.
Eastern Carpenteria, a neighboring region, which had a sanctuary similar to that of West Lansburg has had its otter population decline since its sanctuary status was annuled in 1978. The most probable aftermath of this is decline in biodiversity and healthy enviroment which the region might have been enjoying prior to 1978. In the same vein, it can be argued that the construction of roads along the edge of wetlands could bring the same fate upon West Lansburg, that is the healthy enviroment and biodiversity of West Lansburg will be undermined in the years to come if the road construction is granted.
However, it is pertinent to also consider what could have led to the actual decline in otter population within the Eastern Carpenteria region after 1978. Since there is no strong evidence that it is the construction of roads that brought about the decline of otter population in the region, one might not certainly conclude that road development will lead to similar outcomes for West Lansburg. More so, construction of roads seems urbane and can definitely gentrify the region, leading to economic growth and social development. So it might be seen as a good idea to construct roads in the region.
But then, it is common knowledge that wherever there is commercial or industrial development, population and activities will increase in such a region, and this will most likely cause a decline in biodiversity and healthy enviroment. As a result, the idea that road should not be built in West Lansburg in order to preseve the region's biodiversity and ensure a healthy enviroment could seem totally valid.
Improving biodiversity and ensuring a healthy environment is a critical factor in the sustainability of our planet. Even biodiversity and healthy environment serves as one of the United Nations' sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This shows the importance of maintaining a healthy enviroment. In order to evaluate this argument, it is imperative to consider the effect of building roads along the edge of wetlands of West Lansburg. Looking at a region that has experienced similar development can help throw some lights into this argument.
Eastern Carpenteria, a neighboring region, which had a sanctuary similar to that of West Lansburg has had its otter population decline since its sanctuary status was annulled in 1978. The most probable aftermath of this is decline in biodiversity and healthy environment which the region might have been enjoying prior to 1978. In the same vein, it can be argued that the construction of roads along the edge of wetlands could bring the same fate upon West Lansburg, that is the healthy environment and biodiversity of West Lansburg will be undermined in the years to come if the road construction is granted.
However, it is pertinent to also consider what could have led to the actual decline in otter population within the Eastern Carpenteria region after 1978. Since there is no strong evidence that it is the construction of roads that brought about the decline of otter population in the region, one might not certainly conclude that road development will lead to similar outcomes for West Lansburg. More so, construction of roads seems urbane and can definitely gentrify the region, leading to economic growth and social development. So it might be seen as a good idea to construct roads in the region.
But then, it is common knowledge that wherever there is commercial or industrial development, population and activities will increase in such a region, and this will most likely cause a decline in biodiversity and healthy environment. As a result, the idea that road should not be built in West Lansburg in order to preserve the region's biodiversity and ensure a healthy environment could seem totally valid.
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 351 350
No. of Characters: 1781 1500
No. of Different Words: 161 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.328 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.074 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.936 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.071 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.714 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.575 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
... West Lansburg in order to preserve the regions biodiversity and ensure a healthy envir...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 351.0 441.139720559 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98824682343 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467236467236 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 705.55239521 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8005958799 57.8364921388 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.538461538 119.503703932 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.70786347227 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232472277288 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115189221982 0.0743258471296 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182753670919 0.0701772020484 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177189622028 0.128457276422 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194684634578 0.0628817314937 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.