All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultant would be unnecessary
All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultant would be unnecessary. I disagree with the conclusion that if companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
To begin with, consultants are specialists. They are known to possess a range of experience as a result of having to have worked on various projects and they have observed the common mistakes that companies often make in a particular industry. He or she is someone who possesses some level of expertise in that industry either due to some certificates or experience, or a combination of the two. Hiring that consultant means that they will bring their wide knowledge and experience to look at the challenges faced by the company. Their experience and knowledge can quickly help them identify the friction or issues at hand, and therefore they will be able to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently.
More so, a consultant is an outside, somebody who isn't familiar with the working operations of the company. The employees of the company carry out their responsibility every single day, most likely following a set of procedures already established for them by the company. Getting too familiar with this working operarion could have prevented them from observing things differently. Therefore, they can easily overlook certain minor issues which could have led to the impedement of efficient operation. But an outsider with a different perspective is more likely to quickly locate these minor issues and make recommendations as a result.
While this argument focuses more on the experience, knowledge and the outsider perspective of a hired consultant, it is not always the case. This is because sometimes companies do undermine the capability of their employees by not giving them the chance to explore, to seek better ways of doing things, by expecting them to follow an established path. But if instead companies give leeway to the employees to experiment with certain things outside the scope of their work responsibilities, it is very possible that some of the employees, especially the ingenuous ones could come up with novel ways of making the operations more efficient. But this isn't always the case. Most employees get entrenched in their duties that they can no longer think outside of what they are already familiar with. Owing to this, I believe that hiring consultants is imperative for companies.
Hiring new consultants will mean that the company can also save time. Like the saying goes that time is money. It will take the employees some significant amount of productive time to solve the problem. However, this time can be spent on some other pertinent issues the company is dealing with while the hired consultants resolve the problem of efficiency.
While it appears good for the company to listen to ther employees and let them solve operation efficiency problem, it is more beneficial to hire consultants as they can bring their experience and knowledge acquired while working on various similar projects as well as their outside perspective to the job. Lastly, the company also saves more time which is inadvertently, money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... consultant is an outside, somebody who isnt familiar with the working operations of...
^^^^
Line 7, column 516, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ponsibilities, it is very possible that some of the employees, especially the ingenuous one...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 649, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...the operations more efficient. But this isnt always the case. Most employees get ent...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, look, so, therefore, well, while, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2808.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 541.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19038817006 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.895235572 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447319778189 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 891.9 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6008528474 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.32 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.64 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.525904050947 0.243740707755 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164622820572 0.0831039109588 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167738237646 0.0758088955206 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324983042006 0.150359130593 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.213948610709 0.0667264976115 321% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.