An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid

Vitamin is essential for the growth and development of the human body along with mental health. It is good for the farmers and other consumers to have millet rich in vitamin A. Before depending completely on the new variety of millet seed one must do exhaustive research to examine the benefits and procedures to cultivate the seeds for higher production. Firstly, it should be examined and researched that the new variety of seeds can withstand the environment of Tagus. Thus, the surface research can not claim the conclusion.
The proper study for increasing vitamins should be examined; New and easy process should be carried out. Since the cost of the seed is more; the price of the product is sure to increase. Thus, before cultivating the seed the final price of the product should be encountered well such that it could be easily afforded by the consumers. Along with this, the product is safe to consume or not should be examined. As this is a very new seed in the market the productivity is not estimated well. What if the productivity decreases by 50% and the vitamin A increased by 20%. That does not make any sense if this happens. Thus the proper conclusion should be drawn before selecting the seed.
As per the writer, how can one be so sure that people will easily adapt to a new variety of millet? What if the new variety of millet can't satisfy the palate of Tagus people? Thus, before selecting any conclusion the exhaustive research should be examined.
there might be different procedures to increase the Vitamin for the people of Tagus. Why change the type of seed which has been satisfying the consumer for decades. The people of Tagus can also use Vitamin A tablets as needed. The complexities can be decreased if the vitamin tablets are introduced and given to the people of Tagus as per requirement.
Overall, although the conclusion might be true in some expects, some specific proof should be proclaimed to evaluate the argument clearly. In that case, the conclusion and the whole argument might be more reasonable and convincing.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 411, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e to consume or not should be examined. As this is a very new seed in the market t...
^^
Line 2, column 616, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...oes not make any sense if this happens. Thus the proper conclusion should be drawn b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...llet? What if the new variety of millet cant satisfy the palate of Tagus people? Thu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...xhaustive research should be examined. there might be different procedures to increa...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
.... Why change the type of seed which has been satisfying the consumer for decades. The people of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A tablet' or simply 'tablets'?
Suggestion: A tablet; Tablets
...he people of Tagus can also use Vitamin A tablets as needed. The complexities can be decr...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, thus, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 354.0 441.139720559 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82768361582 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6337396065 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471751412429 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8363113743 57.8364921388 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.6818181818 119.503703932 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 23.324526521 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.70786347227 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.20758483034 183% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330207316276 0.218282227539 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106853002596 0.0743258471296 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600653828785 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187413737256 0.128457276422 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690996000581 0.0628817314937 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.3799401198 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.3550499002 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.197005988 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.5979740519 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 354 350
No. of Characters: 1669 1500
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.338 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.715 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.568 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 120 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 85 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.517 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.322 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.322 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5