As per the analysis provided by the business manager of a television station, they should restore the local and weather news inorder to attract viewers. Also, the business manager states that he want's to attract the previous viewers providing the same content that they were watching. This might not be suffucient to attract the viewers. As per my analysis, i consider it as incomplete research to proclaim the conclusion. One can't gurantee that old viewers wants the same content and also, doing this they can restore previous sponser's and advertisement company.
The intersest of people changes as per their mood. In 20's one love's football and as the day passes they love family drama series and more. Thus, using the same content one can't entertain for a life time. As the increase of internet and technology people are less stable near TV. Every news and updates can be read from smart phones. Thus, it mignt not be necessary for the vewers to watch Tv to know about the local news and weather forecast.
Also, the business manager forget to research the new content that the viewers are seeking. Viewer's might be enjoying comedy series and family drama in place of news and weather forecast. Firstly, the proper research should be performed regarding viewers interest. In addition, business manager should research what new programe's are introduced in other channels.
The business manager should also investigate type advertisement suited for his TV commercial. We can not show the advertisement of alcohol in cartoon. Thus, as per their customer the advertisement should be published. Also, the future conclusion must be established rearding reviving the people's interest to go back to previous programme.
The statement contains much flaw regarding the peoples interest and restoring the advertisement by increasing weather forecast and local news. Overall, while the conclusion might be true in some aspects, certain particular proof should be released to claim the argument. In that case, the conclusion might be more resonable, logical and conincing.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ttract the viewers. As per my analysis, i consider it as incomplete research to p...
^
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...esearch to proclaim the conclusion. One cant gurantee that old viewers wants the sam...
^^^^
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... more. Thus, using the same content one cant entertain for a life time. As the incre...
^^^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...e same content one cant entertain for a life time. As the increase of internet and techno...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, thus, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 55.5748502994 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 331.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2416918429 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68729716783 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501510574018 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7700079368 57.8364921388 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.8636363636 119.503703932 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0454545455 23.324526521 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171695097471 0.218282227539 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522973223657 0.0743258471296 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615916386469 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095916974825 0.128457276422 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423867025541 0.0628817314937 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ttract the viewers. As per my analysis, i consider it as incomplete research to p...
^
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...esearch to proclaim the conclusion. One cant gurantee that old viewers wants the sam...
^^^^
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... more. Thus, using the same content one cant entertain for a life time. As the incre...
^^^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...e same content one cant entertain for a life time. As the increase of internet and techno...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, thus, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 55.5748502994 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 331.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2416918429 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68729716783 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 204.123752495 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501510574018 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7700079368 57.8364921388 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.8636363636 119.503703932 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0454545455 23.324526521 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171695097471 0.218282227539 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522973223657 0.0743258471296 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615916386469 0.0701772020484 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095916974825 0.128457276422 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423867025541 0.0628817314937 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.