An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The following argument has numerous flaws. At first glance it seems to be a quite good strategy by the government to to bolster the new variety of millet, rendering its main conclusion, to combat vitamin A deficiency, the government should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet, invalid.
At first glance, the decision made by the government is quite great, but it is lacking the evidence that why the government is so interested in that particular crop only. may be the government has some hidden intentions behind supporting farmers, e.g., the government is getting very high price for the millet outside their nation, and hence they are so keen to make profits out of it without let any of their citizens knowing about this fact. Being vitamin A deficient among people is common in the nation of Tagus, but why the government didn't do anything else before,, why now, when they came to know about this new breed. The hidden intentions of the government are not clear.
Furthermore, we don't have any proof to justify that people will be interested in purchasing this new type of millet, because we don't know what proportion of the people in Tagus are above poverty line and below it in order to afford. Because, it is blatant that there will be some transportation charges for supplying this new millet and they are already costly, hence making the overall cost much higher than expected. In this case many people will remain vitamin A deficient as before due to their inability to buy them. Then the whole plan of the government will go in vain.
Moreover, many people might never know about this new discovery in case they belong to some rural area of Tagus. They must be away from any kind of advertisement made by their government, and hence won't get the chance to use it, even though they are able to afford this brand new and healthy type of millet.The argument would have been more justified if we have some clue about the advertisement policies of the government for the new millet.
Overall though, the government of the nation of Tagus is trying to do a great job in order to make their people having sufficient amount of vitamin A, but at the same time, the argument is having flaws about the status of the people of Tagus and the government hidden intentions. Therefore, making the argument unwarranted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...a quite good strategy by the government to to bolster the new variety of millet, rend...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: May
...nterested in that particular crop only. may be the government has some hidden inten...
^^^
Line 2, column 540, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nation of Tagus, but why the government didnt do anything else before,, why now, when...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 569, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...government didnt do anything else before,, why now, when they came to know about t...
^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ernment are not clear. Furthermore, we dont have any proof to justify that people w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ing this new type of millet, because we dont know what proportion of the people in T...
^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...is brand new and healthy type of millet.The argument would have been more justified...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'e.g.', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'in conclusion', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.219730941704 0.25644967241 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.14798206278 0.15541462614 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103139013453 0.0836205057962 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0515695067265 0.0520304965353 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0515695067265 0.0272364105082 189% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.130044843049 0.125424944231 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0358744394619 0.0416121511921 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.55020593623 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0358744394619 0.026700313972 134% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.114349775785 0.113004496875 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0224215246637 0.0255425247493 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0134529147982 0.0127820249294 105% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2336.0 2731.13054187 86% => OK
No of words: 408.0 446.07635468 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72549019608 6.12365571057 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.57801047555 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.313725490196 0.378187486979 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.218137254902 0.287650121315 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142156862745 0.208842608468 68% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105392156863 0.135150697306 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55020593623 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 207.018472906 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492647058824 0.469332199767 105% => OK
Word variations: 53.9911979091 52.1807786196 103% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.039408867 70% => OK
Sentence length: 29.1428571429 23.2022227129 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.1927421775 57.7814097925 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.857142857 141.986410481 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 23.2022227129 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.724660767414 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.58251231527 195% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 50.9565826331 51.9672348444 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.53571428571 1.8405768891 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440649598365 0.441005458295 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133652126016 0.135418324435 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0732254832869 0.0829849096947 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.620803952634 0.58762219726 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.209535574927 0.147661913831 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194473529969 0.193483328276 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937113420867 0.0970749176394 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.421341139725 0.42659136922 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0202133624973 0.0774707102158 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313572348666 0.312017818177 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506842088001 0.0698173142475 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 5.36822660099 112% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.