The argument that we should invest our resoursces in unmanned space flights is spurious on various grounds. It is based on assumptions that lacks information to substantiate them.
First of all, the argument posits that the recent success of unmanned space and satellites have demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered. This statement is not proved with enough data to back it up. For instance, has there been any data collected throught these space probes that is used to actually solve any problems? Or has it been helpful in leading to something useful?
On the other hand, the author mentions that through a series of unmanned flights have been successful. Has all the flights been successful in getting useful information? What does series mean? The author fails to give an actual account of the number of space crafts that has acquired some gainful information.
More so, are we supposed to believe all the information from these satellites we get? Is there a way to know that all the information amassed is actually true and certain? Although Satellites have been created by man, but there could be something that malfunctioned during the rotations and the information could be misinterpreted.
Therefore, the argument provided has failed to give an accurate evidence of different things, which has called into question its veracity.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The argument that we should invest our resoursces in unmanned space flights is spurious on various grounds.
Error: resoursces Suggestion: resources
Sentence: For instance, has there been any data collected throught these space probes that is used to actually solve any problems?
Error: throught Suggestion: No alternate word
-------------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- not OK
argument 3 -- not OK
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 223 350
No. of Characters: 1120 1500
No. of Different Words: 131 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.864 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.022 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.754 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 84 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.898 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.339 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.608 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.089 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, so, therefore, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 55.5748502994 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 2260.96107784 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 223.0 441.139720559 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15246636771 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8212586717 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 204.123752495 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582959641256 0.468620217663 124% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 705.55239521 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5758120316 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0714285714 119.503703932 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9285714286 23.324526521 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.70786347227 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279780406052 0.218282227539 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883270847189 0.0743258471296 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893657132092 0.0701772020484 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133192106634 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905076751712 0.0628817314937 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 98.500998004 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.