Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Would it be appropriate to offer funding to someone just on the basis that he or she cannot pay the university tuition? In my opinion, that is a hard no. The question of whether or not a student is awarded a full scholarship like that has to have some criteria for students to fulfill and the government and university should aptly vet the student before giving such an award. There may be benchmark set for students to conclude if they actually deserve such an honor. In doing so, a university should look for the following qualities in a candidate.
The first and the foremost quality should be judging a student’s conviction toward a particular educational program. The passion that a pupil has for his field that drives him or her to achieving a higher degree should be taken into account. Also, the past academic record of the prospect student must be taken into consideration. More so, the agenda of getting the education is a valid fact to be analyzed. How much the student is willing to do and at what length he or she would go to secure such a grant. Even if a protégé fits the bill and manages to get the grant, the idea of him or her applying that knowledge professionally and giving back to the community must be scrutinized.
In contrast, when a student gets a grant just on the basis that they cannot pay the tuition fee and are admitted to the university on the grounds of previous satisfying records, then it may be hard to judge if the student should be granted free education. And there may be a few candidates fulfilling the criteria and proving eligible for the scholarship. However, there is a specific budget and Government may not be able to pay for all of them.
Therefore, the governments and universities should set strict rules and criteria and maintain a policy, so that the truly deserving candidates get the opportunity of a free education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...tion? In my opinion, that is a hard no. The question of whether or not a student is awarded a full scho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, as for, as to, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 332.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68975903614 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81870263687 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512048192771 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0402159426 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176248911105 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629925506906 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483488844578 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12092828082 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459435128633 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.